GOP Tea Party frontrunner: ‘Abolish’ public schools

By Sahil Kapur A Tea Party-backed Republican congressional nominee has championed abolishing public schools in California, and is currently the favorite to win his November election.

The candidate, David Harmer, a corporate lawyer who has yet to serve in public office, is up against two-term Democratic incumbent Jerry McNerney for California's 11th district -- located in Northern California -- in the House of Representatives.

Harmer made the argument to kill public schools in a 2000 op-ed for the San Francisco Chronicle, which was dug up Thursday by Nick Baumann of Mother Jones.

Framing the issue as a struggle between government tyranny and freedom -- a preferred political tactic of conservatives -- Harmer wrote: "In the freest and most prosperous country on Earth, in the midst of the information age, government ownership and operation of the schools is a counterproductive anachronism."

He added: "So long as the state Constitution mandates free public schools, a voucher system (or refundable tuition tax credit) is the best we can do. To attain quantum leaps in educational quality and opportunity, however, we need to separate school and state entirely. Government should exit the business of running and funding schools

The GOP candidate argued in the Chronicle that his vision for education reflects "the way things worked through the first century of American nationhood." As Baumann notes, that was an era "when educational opportunities for poor people, African-Americans, women, the disabled, and others were, to say the least, extremely limited."

Although Harmer holds a slim lead in the polls -- 49.4 to 48.4 percent -- polling expert Nate Silver of the New York Times analyzes the dynamics of the race and gives the Tea Party favorite a considerable 54.7 to 45.3 percent chance of victory next month.

Yet Harmer's views on education, largely ignored so far, could hurt him in a state where the public school and college system is so treasured that even Republican gubernatorial nominee Meg Whitman -- bucking her party's trend of defiance to publicly-funded education -- has pledged to strengthen California's public schools.

Read Baumann's Mother Jones article for more context and perspective.

M.C.L Comment: Another example of why liberals should vote in three weeks, I'm currently going back and forth with one of these "concerned" citizens on the right and I told him if Dems lose this election I won't be angry at the tea party people or blue collar conservatives for the simple fact these idiots since the election and re-election of President Reagan have always voted against their own best social and economic interest it's nothing new but my anger would be direct on our side because we knew what was at stake and we knew what will happen if the orange bastard becomes speaker Orange Bastard. But instead of voting just to keep some form sanity in the government liberals decided because President Obama didn't handle their pet political issues the way they wanted, they took their ball and ran home thus allowing the forces of the greedy and the stupid to take over the country. And the people on the left who advocated this plan of staying home and allowing Republicans to obtain power will be the first ones screaming about how crappy the outcome is the morning after.