Monday, March 12, 2007

Who writes this stuff over at Detroit News?

Talk to Bouchard before raising taxes
Talk to Bouchard before raising taxes Oakland sheriff has ideas to cut budget without slashing services W hen opponents of Gov. Jennifer Granholm's proposal to raise taxes urge covering the shortfall by taking a different approach to doing business in Michigan, it's not always clear what they mean. So Oakland County Sheriff Michael Bouchard provides a few specific examples. His county jail, with 2,000 inmates, contracts with a private company to provide inmate meals. The savings over paying county employees to cook and serve meals is $1.2 million a year, Bouchard says. The state has 51,000 inmates in its prisons. If the savings Oakland County achieves can be duplicated at the state level, Michigan could cut more than $40 million from its prison food service bill. Oakland County also privatized pharmaceutical services for inmates for an annual savings of $440,000. Again, adopting that idea for the state corrections system could save $12 million or more. Bouchard also projects that contracting out the State Police dispatch system could save $500,000 a year, allowing more troopers to stay on the highways. Just a few ideas, but they add up to a potential savings of more than $50 million. That's just in one department. If Bouchard's approach to operating government in a more creative and efficient way were applied across the state budget, there's no telling how much money could be saved. But we'd love for the state to find out. Other sources have offered additional ideas for cutting the budget without devastating state government. The governor, however, seems locked to an either/or choice: Either raise taxes or slash critical services. Granholm insists that it's not possible to erase the $800 million deficit through budget cuts. But she can't say for sure, because she hasn't approached the problem the way Bouchard recommends. State taxpayers might be a lot more comfortable with the idea of raising taxes if they were certain that their leaders had explored every other avenue for balancing the budget. As Bouchard demonstrates, they haven't done that yet.

Dem urges Gonzales to quit

No. 3 Senate Dem urges Gonzales to quit - Yahoo! News No. 3 Senate Dem urges Gonzales to quit By HOPE YEN, Associated Press Writer 15 minutes ago The Senate's No. 3 Democrat said Sunday that Attorney General Alberto Gonzales should resign because he is putting politics above the law. Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record) cited the FBI's illegal snooping into people's private lives and the Justice Department's firing of federal prosecutors. Schumer, D-N.Y., said Gonzales repeatedly has shown more allegiance to President Bush than to citizens' legal rights since taking his job in early 2005. He branded Gonzales, a former White House counsel, as one of the most political attorneys general in recent history. "Attorney General Gonzales is a nice man, but he either doesn't accept or doesn't understand that he is no longer just the president's lawyer, but has a higher obligation to the rule of law and the Constitution even when the president should not want it to be so," Schumer said. "And so this department has been so political that I think for the sake of the nation, Attorney General Gonzales should step down," he said. As vice chairman of the Democratic caucus, Schumer is No. 3 in the Senate leadership. Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., a member of the Democrat-controlled Judiciary Committee, said Gonzales would be "better off" if he resigned. "There is very little credibility in the Justice Department right now," Biden said. He cited what he said were abuses of power dating to Gonzales' tenure as White House counsel in which he advocated aggressive interrogations of suspected terrorists that pushed the boundaries of the law. "I think Gonzales has lost the confidence of the vast majority of the American people," he said. "I think he's lost the confidence of the Congress." Pennsylvania Sen. Arlen Specter (news, bio, voting record), the top Republican on the committee, said Gonzales' resignation was a "question for the president and the attorney general." "I do think there have been lots of problems," said Specter, who last week suggested that a Gonzales tenure may have run its course. "Before we come to conclusions, I think we need to know more facts." Justice spokesman Brian Roehrkasse said the attorney general had made significant strides to protect national security, increase prosecutions of sex offenders and immigration offenses and fight gang violence. "The attorney general demonstrated decisive leadership by demanding a new level of accountability to address systematic problems in oversight over some of the FBI's national security tools," Roehrkasse said. The lawmakers' comments come after a week in which the Justice Department found itself on the defensive over the U.S. attorneys and the FBI's misuse of a type of subpoena known as national security letters. On Friday, Gonzales and FBI director Robert Mueller acknowledged the FBI had broken the law to secretly pry out personal information about people in the U.S. as part of its pursuit of suspected terrorists and spies. The admission came after a blistering 126-page report by the Justice Department's inspector general that found agents improperly obtained telephone records and demanded sensitive data. The information was obtained via security letters, which are special warrants issued without judicial approval. Under criticism by lawmakers, Gonzales also agreed to tighten the law for replacing U.S. attorneys and to let Congress hear from senior department officials with roles in the ousters. Several U.S. attorneys allege they were unfairly dismissed without explanation after they pursued corruption probes into Republicans or declined to rush specific investigations into Democrats before last November's congressional election. Gonzales and other officials have denied the charges. Sen. Lindsey Graham (news, bio, voting record), R-S.C., said it is the Bush administration's right to fire U.S. attorneys because they serve at the will of the president. Still, he said, the Justice Department was wrong to attack their reputations. "I don't believe the attorney general will resign, but this whole episode was unnecessarily poorly handled," Graham said. Over the weekend, Bush pledged an end to the FBI lapses that caused the illegal snooping but expressed confidence in the response by Mueller and Gonzales. Mueller has accepted responsibility, and both have pledged to fix problems. Bush said that while the inspector general's report "justly made issue of FBI shortfalls, (it) also made clear that these letters were important to the security of the United States." Lawmakers from both parties called the FBI abuses unacceptable. They noted it was Congress that demanded the inspector general review the program even as Justice Department officials were providing assurances the government's surveillance programs were being run responsibly. In coming hearings by the Judiciary Committee, senators plan to consider whether to scale back some of the government's law enforcement powers in light of the abuses. Schumer and Specter were on "Face the Nation" on CBS; Biden and Graham spoke on "Late Edition" on CNN. ___

Friday, March 09, 2007

Glenn Beck say the dumbest things

http://mediamatters.org/items/200703090002 On the March 8 edition of his CNN Headline News program, Glenn Beck issued the following warning to members of Congress who support the Democratic leaders' plan to set a date certain for U.S. withdrawal from Iraq: "If your bill goes through, I hope you can't go to bed any single night without the images of body bags of our American soldiers coming off those planes. I hope they dance in your head every single night, because you will be just as responsible for their deaths as anyone who has ever strapped a bomb to their chest and screamed, 'Allah Akbar.' " From the March 8 edition of CNN Headline News' Glenn Beck: BECK: The blood of our troops will be on the hands of Congress soon. Here's how I got there. The Democratic Party leaders are proposing a new bill, which calls for bringing the troops home from Iraq by early next year, then removing whatever troops remain by October 2008. [...] BECK: Here's what I don't know. How do these people in Congress, Democrats and Republicans, who want to have it both ways, how do you sleep at night? How do you do it? If your bill goes through, I hope you can't go to bed any single night without the images of body bags of our American soldiers coming off those planes. I hope they dance in your head every single night, because you will be just as responsible for their deaths as anyone who has ever strapped a bomb to their chest and screamed, "Allah Akbar."

Newt Gingrich a hypocrite get out of here...

Gingrich had affair during Clinton probe - Yahoo! News Gingrich had affair during Clinton probe By BEN EVANS, Associated Press WriterThu Mar 8, 11:04 PM ET Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich acknowledged he was having an extramarital affair even as he led the charge against President Clinton over the Monica Lewinsky affair, he acknowledged in an interview with a conservative Christian group. "The honest answer is yes," Gingrich, a potential 2008 Republican presidential candidate, said in an interview with Focus on the Family founder James Dobson to be aired Friday, according to a transcript provided to The Associated Press. "There are times that I have fallen short of my own standards. There's certainly times when I've fallen short of God's standards." Gingrich argued in the interview, however, that he should not be viewed as a hypocrite for pursuing Clinton's infidelity. "The president of the United States got in trouble for committing a felony in front of a sitting federal judge," the former Georgia congressman said of Clinton's 1998 House impeachment on perjury and obstruction of justice charges. "I drew a line in my mind that said, 'Even though I run the risk of being deeply embarrassed, and even though at a purely personal level I am not rendering judgment on another human being, as a leader of the government trying to uphold the rule of law, I have no choice except to move forward and say that you cannot accept ... perjury in your highest officials." Widely considered a mastermind of the Republican revolution that swept Congress in the 1994 elections, Gingrich remains wildly popular among many conservatives. He has repeatedly placed near the top of Republican presidential polls recently, even though he has not formed a campaign. Gingrich has said he is waiting to see how the Republican field shapes up before deciding in the fall whether to run. Reports of extramarital affairs have dogged him for years as a result of two messy divorces, but he has refused to discuss them publicly. Gingrich, who frequently campaigned on family values issues, divorced his second wife, Marianne, in 2000 after his attorneys acknowledged Gingrich's relationship with his current wife, Callista Bisek, a former congressional aide more than 20 years younger than he is. His first marriage, to his former high school geometry teacher, Jackie Battley, ended in divorce in 1981. Although Gingrich has said he doesn't remember it, Battley has said Gingrich discussed divorce terms with her while she was recuperating in the hospital from cancer surgery. Gingrich married Marianne months after the divorce. "There were times when I was praying and when I felt I was doing things that were wrong. But I was still doing them," he said in the interview. "I look back on those as periods of weakness and periods that I'm ... not proud of." Gingrich's congressional career ended in 1998 when he abruptly resigned from Congress after poor showings from Republicans in elections and after being reprimanded by the House ethics panel over charges that he used tax-exempt funding to advance his political goals.

Firefighter unions assails Rudy..

Firefighters union assails Giuliani - Yahoo! News Firefighters union assails Giuliani By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer 8 minutes ago One of the nation's largest firefighters' union has accused Republican presidential contender Rudy Giuliani, the former New York City mayor, of committing "egregious acts" against firefighters who died in the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks. The International Association of Fire Fighters, in a draft letter, excoriated Giuliani for his November 2001 decision to cut back the number of firefighters searching the rubble of Ground Zero for the remains of some 300 fallen comrades. The 280,000-member union accused him of expediting the clean-up process with a "scoop-and-dump" operation after the recovery of millions of dollars in gold, silver and other assets from the Bank of Nova Scotia that had been buried. The union has long assailed the former mayor, but the latest criticism comes as several polls put Giuliani ahead by wide margins in the GOP nomination race. The letter prompted the Giuliani campaign to counter with its own letter from Lee Delpi, a retired New York firefighter. "There is no one who respects firefighters and first responders more than Rudy Giuliani," Delpi wrote. Giuliani's campaign distributed Delpi's letter on Friday and announced the support of nearly 100 South Carolina firefighters as it sought to blunt the impact of the criticism. The union's latest broadside was included in a scathing letter dated Feb. 28. Union officials say the letter was drafted as leaders were weighing whether to invite Giuliani to a presidential candidate forum but never was distributed to members because the union ultimately invited Giuliani. "We were inviting all the candidates and excluding one because of something that he had done and not excluding others would have been disingenuous so we decided to invite Rudy," said Jeff Zack, a union spokesman. Giuliani, however, declined the invitation to next week's forum, citing scheduling conflicts. Nevertheless, the letter showed up on Web sites this week. "The disrespect that he exhibited to our 343 fallen FDNY brothers, their families and our New York City IAFF leadership in the wake of that tragic day has not been forgiven or forgotten," the letter says. "Mayor Giuliani's actions meant that fire fighters and citizens who perished would either remain buried at Ground Zero forever, with no closure for families, or be removed like garbage and deposited at the Fresh Kills Landfill," it said, adding: "Hundreds remained entombed in Ground Zero when Giuliani gave up on them." The union said the purpose of the letter was "to make all our members aware of the egregious acts Mayor Giuliani committed against our members, our fallen on 9/11 and our New York City union officers following that horrific day." Delpi, for his part, said he was "deeply disappointed and disheartened" by the union's recent political activities and called the letter offensive and inaccurate. "Those of use who have worked with him know that Rudy Giuliani has always been a steadfast and unrelenting supporter of firefighters and first responders," Delpi said in the statement. Tim Brown, a former firefighter and Executive Director of Firefighters for Rudy, added: "We are honored by the support of so many first responders from across the country and are appreciative of their continued enthusiasm for Mayor Giuliani's candidacy." The union says it's bipartisan. It endorsed Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry in 2004. At least 10 Republican and Democratic candidates plan to attend Wednesday's forum, including Democratic Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton and Barack Obama (news, bio, voting record), and former Sen. John Edwards. On the Republican side, the only top tier candidate who has committed is GOP Sen. John McCain (news, bio, voting record) of Arizona. Mitt Romney, the former Massachusetts governor, also was invited.

Behind the low comedy, high stakes

Detroit Free Press - www.freep.com - BRIAN DICKERSON: Behind the low comedy, high stakes Behind the low comedy, high stakes March 9, 2007 BY BRIAN DICKERSON FREE PRESS COLUMNIST When last we peeked in on the guardians of Michigan's judicial system, as I recall, they were rolling around on the floor of the state Supreme Court chamber, trading insults and eye-gouges in a disciplinary proceeding involving Geoffrey Fieger (who'd been hauled before them, ironically enough, for making unflattering remarks about judges). Now the skirmishing has resumed, with Justice Elizabeth Weaver renewing accusations that her GOP colleagues are making mischief in secret conclaves and the targeted justices insinuating that Weaver's elevator no longer goes all the way to the top. It would all be raucous good fun -- if only the stakes in this ugly little hissing match were as small as the combatants waging it. But a meltdown in Michigan's court of last resort is no petty domestic dispute, however much it may resemble one. The judiciary's credibility is under siege, although that has less to do with the personalities of the incumbent justices than with the lingering legacy of former Gov. John Engler(R-fat bastard). An arm of the party The state Supreme Court was a creature of partisan politics long before Engler came along. But it wasn't until Engler's last term, when his appointees achieved majority control of the high court, that justices were explicitly enlisted as guarantors of one party's policy agenda. In 1998, when he was hustling insurance industry support for Maura Corrigan's Supreme Court candidacy, Engler was candid about his objectives. "We need to elect justices who will uphold the tort reforms adopted by Republican legislators," he told a fund-raising dinner I attended, referring to a controversial package of bills that had tipped the balance of power in liability cases in favor of deep-pocket defendants. It was a case of the state's most powerful politician promising what his judicial candidates were forbidden to -- a specific judicial outcome in exchange for the financial support of a favored group of litigants. In the nine years since, Corrigan and her GOP colleagues have more than delivered, systematically emasculating Supreme Court precedents that had protected insurance policyholders, accident victims and targets of discrimination. Bolting the caucus Weaver, the only Republican justice to reach judicial office without Engler's sponsorship, initially was a reliable ally of the new majority, but she soon came to resent her GOP colleagues. In Weaver's view, the Engler justices were behaving more like a partisan legislative caucus than like members of a collegial court. Some critics charged that the new justices had an explicit agenda -- a list of Supreme Court precedents marked for reversal. Weaver's most recent critiques of her GOP colleagues are an odd grab bag of personal grievances and substantive allegations that go to the heart of the majority's impartiality. The latter deserve serious public scrutiny, and the hearings Senate Judiciary Chairman Paul Condino has scheduled later this month are a good place to start. This court's problems are bigger than Betty, and it will take more than family counseling to address them.

Granholm to woo European execs..

Detroit Free Press - www.freep.com - Granholm traveling to Europe to woo execs, meet with Zetsche Granholm traveling to Europe to woo execs, meet with Zetsche March 9, 2007 By CHRIS CHRISTOFF FREE PRESS LANSING BUREAU LANSING – Gov. Jennifer Granholm said today she hopes to seal a few deals to bring automotive research jobs to Michigan, as she prepares for her second trade mission to Germany and Austria on Monday. Granholm said she’ll meet with executives from six companies that are considering new operations in the United States. She also will meet with DaimlerChrysler AG CEO Dieter Zetsche. That meeting comes as DaimlerChrysler considers selling off Chrysler. Granholm said she’ll emphasize that whatever happens to Chrysler, it should not abandon Michigan and its long history here, or its skilled workers.“They’re making some decisions,” she said. “For us to be able to really reach out and say, ‘This is home. We want our workforce to be your workforce.’”She added, “Whatever their business decision is, we want it to be a decision that benefits Michigan.”Granholm said she hopes to close the deal with a few companies to open operations in Michigan, and that she’s making a pitch to the others – as are other states and other countries. She said those companies are developing high-tech, alternative engines and power trains for vehicles. She said her sales pitch will focus on Michigan’s long experience with automotive research, manufacturing, its wealth of automotive engineers and it’s quality of life. “Michigan is the place to be if you need to do that kind of work,” she told reporters. Granholm will be joined in Europe by James Epolito, president and CEO of the Michigan Economic Development Corporation. It will be her fourth trade mission, including two to Japan.

Thursday, March 08, 2007

American Press drops Ann Coulter

Media Matters - American Press editor tells Media Matters his paper "dropped Ann Coulter on Monday"
American Press editor tells Media Matters his paper "dropped Ann Coulter on Monday" Summary: Media Matters for America has learned that the American Press of Lake Charles, Louisiana, has dropped right-wing pundit Ann Coulter's nationally syndicated column from its opinion pages, apparently in response to her March 2 remarks at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC), referring to Democratic presidential candidate and former Sen. John Edwards (NC) as a "faggot." According to a March 8 email Media Matters received from American Press editor Brett Downer, the paper "dropped Ann Coulter on Monday," three days after Coulter made her comments at CPAC. Downer did not say whether Coulter was dropped as a result of her comments. After Editor & Publisher revealed that the Lancaster New Era (Lancaster, Pennsylvania), The Oakland Press (Pontiac, Michigan), and The Mountain Press (Sevier County, Tennessee) had dropped Coulter as a result of her comments at CPAC, Media Matters published a list of news outlets that continue to publish Coulter's column. Media Matters later noted that The Times of Shreveport, Louisiana, also decided to drop Coulter as a result of her comments, which editor Alan English described as "the back-breaking straw for a decision we've openly discussed for some time." After receiving a tip that the American Press had dropped Coulter, Media Matters sought clarification from Downer.

Plame to testify before congress

Valerie Plame to testify before Congress - Yahoo! News Valerie Plame to testify before Congress By LAURIE KELLMAN, Associated Press Writer1 hour, 11 minutes ago Valerie Plame, the CIA operative exposed after her husband criticized President Bush's march to war, will testify next week before lawmakers probing how the White House dealt with her identity, the chairman of the panel said Thursday. Also invited to testify March 16 before the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee is Patrick Fitzgerald, who this week won conviction of I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby of obstruction and perjury in the case, said Chairman Henry Waxman (news, bio, voting record), D-Calif. Waxman said Plame has accepted the invitation and Fitzgerald has not responded. In a letter to the prosecutor, Waxman proposed a meeting with ranking Republican Tom Davis of Virginia to discuss the terms of any testimony. The hearing will be the first public forum at which Plame has agreed to answer questions. At a news conference in July announcing a lawsuit against Libby and other Bush administration officials, Plame read a short statement but did not respond to questions. "The trial proceedings raise questions about whether senior White House officials, including the vice president and Senior Adviser to the President Karl Rove, complied with the requirements governing the handling of classified information," Waxman wrote in his invitation to Fitzgerald. "They also raise questions about whether the White House took appropriate remedial action following the leak and whether the existing requirements are sufficient to protect against future leaks," Waxman added. "Your perspective on these matters is important." Fitzgerald has made clear that, unlike earlier independent counsels appointed under a law now expired, he is not required to submit investigative reports to Congress. "I think we should conduct this like any other criminal investigation: charge someone or be quiet," Fitzgerald said when he announced Libby's indictment. His spokesman, Randall Samborn, said he didn't know whether that policy would affect Fitzgerald's response to Congress. "We've only just received it and we're going to review it," he said. "No decision has been made." Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, is the highest-ranking White House official convicted in a government scandal since the Iran-Contra affair two decades ago. Libby's attorneys, who are expected to ask for a new trial, told jurors that Libby was made a scapegoat while Rove, former White House Press Secretary Ari Fleischer and former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage were the actual leakers. Attorney Theodore Wells said Thursday he didn't expect hearings to bring out any new information. "I think, for anyone who followed the case, the facts are out there," Wells said. "I don't know of any other leaks. You've got Fleischer with multiple, Rove with two, Armitage with two. I'm assuming that's it and I still believe Libby didn't leak." Plame's name was leaked to reporters in mid-2003 after her husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, began criticizing the Bush administration's handling of prewar intelligence on Iraq. Nobody was charged with breaking a law by discussing Plame and Libby is the only person charged with a crime in the case. Plame's name arose often during Libby's trial, but she did not testify. Waxman said the trial raised questions that Plame and others could perhaps answer. "The Committee will receive testimony from Ms. Wilson and other experts regarding the disclosure and internal White House security procedures for protecting her identity from disclosure and responding to the leak after it occurred," according to Waxman's statement. Though the criminal case is over, Wilson and Plame have a civil lawsuit pending against Libby, Cheney, former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage and others. ___ Associated Press writer Matt Apuzzo contributed to this report.

GOPer had knowledge of Walter Reed conditions and hid it..

The Raw Story GOP Rep. reveals first hand knowledge of Walter Reed conditions, details Army patient's death GOP Rep. reveals first hand knowledge of Walter Reed conditions, details Army patient's death Filed by Michael Roston The top Republican who previously chaired the committee that wrote Defense budget bills admitted yesterday that he was aware of many problems at the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, but feared that more aggressive oversight would "give the Army a black eye." He alleged in a lengthy statement that an Army Staff Sergeant died at Walter Reed Army Medical hospital several days after a respiratory therapist mistakenly conducted a percussive therapy exercise that caused the soldier to bleed heavily. The explanation appeared to contradict the official cause of death of William T. Latham, pictured at the right, reported by the Pentagon in 2003. Young's remarks came during the course of a Defense Appropriations hearing on "Walter Reed Infrastructure," before three top Army generals who oversaw the service's medical system. Preferred 'person to person' oversight In his introductory remarks remarks, Rep. C.W. "Bill" Young (R-FL), who chaired the Defense Subcommittee of the House Appropriations Committee, explained why he had not carried out the kind of oversight that was now occurring on the treatment of soldiers at Walter Reed. "General Kiley, we did not go public with these concerns because we did not want to undermine the confidence of the patients and their families and give the army a black eye while fighting a war," he said. Young also seemed to worry about embarrassing soldiers and their families. "I would not hold hearings on patients and their problems and violate their privacy," he said. Young and his wife, Beverly, have done extensive volunteer work at Walter Reed, and he said he used his contacts to make changes in a more 'personal' way. "We worked person to person, directly with civilian and military leaders to solve the individual problems without casting blame on the many good functions at Walter Reed," he said. The former chairman of the Defense Appropriations Subcommittee also said his committee had carried out regular hearings on the military medical care system and called out the generals testifying before the committee for not bringing the problems now seen at Walter Reed to the fore. "Knowing there were problems at Walter Reed, why didn't you just level with us? Why didn't you just tell us what the situation really was if you knew, rather than continue to suggest that everything was OK? " he asked. "This committee has been a partner in ensuring all the services have had what they needed, and more, to provide the best in military medicine." Raises questions about soldier's death Rep. Young of Florida spoke at length in the hearing and identified three cases of poor treatment of soldiers at Walter Reed which had not been previously publicized. During his remarks, Young insisted the statements he was making were not based on hearsay, and that he had personal knowledge of the incidents. In the third case he discussed, he revealed actions that might have contributed to the death of Army Staff Sergeant William Latham in 2003. Latham was 29 when he died on June 18, 2003. He was a native of Kingman, Arizona and a member of the 3rd Armored Cavalry based out of Fort Carson, Colorado. The Pentagon, in an official announcement, said that Latham had been hit by shrapnel in Iraq during a May 19 raid on an arms market, and that "he died of his wounds" a month later. Latham had a wife, Melissa, and three children. Young and his wife had become close to the family of Staff Sgt. Latham after being asked to intervene in their case. The Youngs had tried to have Latham transferred to the Navy's medical center at Bethesda because facilities at Walter Reed needed to treat Latham had broken down. But the proposal had been vetoed by the Army out of concern that it was not safe to move him. Latham, Young explained, had a tube inserted in his brain to relieve a leaking aneurysm. Several days before the soldier's death, Young stated that a respiratory therapist entered Latham's room and prepared to conduct "percussions" that had been ordered. When Latham's wife objected and worried that the therapy would affect Latham's aneurysm, the therapist checked the patient's chart, and claimed to see no indication of an aneurysm on his records. The therapist began the treatment, at which point, the Florida Congressman said Latham bled profusely from his brain. He died several days later. The Congressman was careful not to say directly that the respiratory therapist had killed Latham. "Maybe he would have died anyway, I don't know," he said. "I'm not a medical person." Still, Young called Latham's death "a tragic experience." Young, who missed an important vote in Congress in 2003 to attend Latham's funeral, according to the St. Petersburg Times, explained why he had not spoken up about Latham's death. I've never wanted to go public with it because I wouldn't without the permission of the parents and the wife," Young said. "And in this case, when they knew they were doing this hearing, they asked me to do that." A full transcript of Rep. Young's remarks on Staff Sgt. William Latham are presented below. # The last case, this is one I really don't want to bring up, but the parents of this soldier, and the wife of this soldier asked me to please bring up this case. We got into this case by the call of a very high ranking army official who knew of Beverly's interest and concern, and of our work with a lot of the wounded kids and their families at Walter Reed and at Bethesda. He said this is a very serious case. The family has serious problems, will you poease go to the hospital, find the family, and do what you can to help. And she said "of course I will." And that's what she did, that's what we did. This was a long drawn out case. The soldier's name is Staff Sergeant William Latham. Staff Sergeant Latham was injured in Iraq when eh was blowing in a door, the explosion came back into his face and head, and it caused severe damage. He never really regained consciousness until a few weeks later at Walter Reed hospital. This is a long story, and I'll make it very short. Staff Sgt. Latham had a bleeding, leaking aneurysm in his brain, and that was pretty obvious, because he had a tube in the side of his head. It was obvious that he had a leaking aneurysm. Sgt. Latham became quite ill, he did show signs of being conscious. He asked his father at one point "What happened Dad?" So we know that he regained consciousness, at least briefly. Medical Corps at Walter Reed made the decision that Staff Sgt. Latham needed some emergency surgery to fix the aneurysm in his brain before it killed him. The Cath Lab that I talked about in my opening statement was malfunctioning. It wasn't running, it wasn't working. i couldn't hardly believe that, so I asked my staff assistant who was also an attorney, I said "go down to the cath lab and find out what's going on" and he did. And he went down with the hospital commander and came back and said "It's broken, it doesn't work." Beverly drove to Bethesda and called Don Arthur and said to Admiral Arthur, "Here's the situation, can you help?" He said "I think so, let me see what's going on." She got in the car, and drove over to Bethesda, she went to Don Arthur, met him in his office, explained the case as to what was happening with Staff Sgt. Will Latham. He talked to General Kiley, he said "We can fix this, we have the equipment, it's up and running, we'll send an ambulance and bring him over." Now Admiral Arthur says that he was told no, we're not going to do that, we can take care of our own, and we think it's too dangerous to move in. Maybe it was too dangerous. But the next morning, a respiratory therapist came to the room of Staff Sgt. Latham who has a tube coming out of his head because he has a leaking aneurysm. The respiratory therapist goes into the room and is about to begin the percussions that he said were needed and were ordered. Staff Sgt. Latham's wife, who is now his widow said "I don't know that you should do that. He has this leaking aneurysm." The respiratory therapist went out to the hall, checked the chart, came back and said "There's no mention on the chart of the aneurysm, and the directions are to do physical therapy," or respiratory therapy. Mrs. Latham said "Will that hurt him? The therapist said no, started to pound on his back, and it was at that point, huge amounts of blood came shooting out of that tube, out of his brain. The family saw what was happening. The Lathams had three kids back at home. Melissa knew that it was all over at that point. She asked Beverly if she would stay with Will until he died, and she did. And he died a few days later. Maybe he would have died anyway, I don't know. Maybe if we would have taken him to Bethesda, maybe he wouldn't have survived, I don't know that either, I'm not a medical person. My wife has great training as a medic, she was a medic, and she got her training at an Army hospital, by the way, so she knows a little bit about Army procedures and Army medicine. These things should not happen in a first-class hospital with first-class people who are doctors and nurses and it's just something that, this has been on my mind for a long time. And I've never wanted to public with it because I wouldn't without the permission of the parents and the wife. And in this case, when they knew they were doing this hearing, they asked me to do that. So I don't know if you want to comment on that or not. But I think that is a tragic experience for everyone involved. So our role here, my role as a member of this Congress and this committee, our role is to fix what needs to be fixed, to guarantee that our soldiers, our heroes, our people who are doing what they've been sent to do on the battlefield, that they are getting the type of care that they deserve, and they deserve the best medical care that we have available. And as I've said, if we don't identify the problem we don't fix it. I've just identified three problems where the parents asked me to do so.

Wednesday, March 07, 2007

The right's newest Jeff Gannon

CPAC's Gay Porn Star Honoree, Ann Coulter, and the Politics of Personal Crisis don't know if David Horowitz knew Cpl. Matt Sanchez was once a gay porn star and male prostitute when he introduced him to me at last weekend's CPAC. But he did know that Sanchez was an eager yes-man, and a supposed victim of the campus PC thuggery Horowitz has made a career out of decrying. As Horowitz played cardiologist, ranting to me about how each leftist "has hatred in his heart" and how members of the New Left to which he once belonged had "treason in their hearts," Sanchez stood faithfully by his side, muttering encouragement. "That's right. That's right," Sanchez would say, almost on cue. Whenever I spoke, Sanchez would mumble something under his breath like, "That's such a lie! Omigod!" or "See! Liberals are hateful." Horowitz probably discovered Sanchez after the ex-Marine appeared on Hannity & Colmes alleging that while studying at Columbia University, he was called a "baby-killer" by members of that school's International Socialist Organization. This alleged episode, which was investigated by Columbia but never confirmed, also earned Sanchez a spot on the O'Reilly Factor. For his supposed courage in the face of liberal cruelty, Cpl. Sanchez was presented with the Jeanne Kirpatrick Academic Freedom Award at this year's CPAC. Sanchez was the perfect vehicle for the conservative movement's ongoing attempt to wrap itself in the uniform, and to heap resentment on liberals for their supposed anti-military bias. Soon, Sanchez was rubbing shoulders with the likes of Ann Coulter and Michelle Malkin. Malkin posted a shot of herself beside the corporal on her blog. Sanchez was clad in full military regalia and Malkin wore a big smile. But Malkin is not smiling anymore. Like so many of Sanchez's boosters, she was mugged by reality. As several gay blogs revealed late yesterday, Corporal Sanchez was known during his halcyon days as Rod Majors, a majorly well-endowed gay porn star. (Photos of Corp. Sanchez aka Rod Majors in action can be viewed here. I warn you, this link is NOT to be clicked on if you have minors around or if you're in a crowded workplace). According to Tom Bacchus, Sanchez was also a $200-an-hour male prostitute who advertised himself (here) as an "excellent top." There is of course nothing inherently wrong with Sanchez being a gay porn star or a male escort. His past is only notable because he chose to join a movement that exploits anti-gay sentiment for political gain. Coulter's now-famous "faggot" remark was not an aberration, but rather a symbol of the politics of resentment that propels the conservative movement and its elected Republican surrogates; a reflection of the bigotry conservatives have sought to write into the Constitution through the so-called Federal Marriage Amendment. The ascendant "family values" wing of the right is also responsible for sabotaging legislation allowing homosexuals to serve openly in the armed forces, a maneuver that may now spell the end of Sanchez's career. As Sanchez marched down the road from the gay sex industry to the conservative movement, he followed in the footsteps of Jeff Gannon, Ted Haggard and many others. Whether Sanchez knew the right was filled with people just like him, something about it must have appealed to him. Ann Coulter behavior reflects a psychology similar to Sanchez's. Coulter has made a career out of criticizing the sexual peccadiloes of liberal icons from Ted Kennedy to Bill Clinton, who she dubbed "a horny hick." She appeared on James Dobson's radio show to promote her recent polemic accusing liberals of despoiling America's social fabric by advancing sexual libertinism, abortion and gay marriage. Like Dobson, Coulter has been a constant and especially strident critic of feminism. But few have benefitted more from the legacy of liberalism in general and feminism in particular than Coulter. Coulter, after all, is a sexually liberated, career-minded, single woman in her 40's. At the height of the Monica Lewinsky drama, during which she acted as one of Ken Starr's "elves," Coulter was reportedly sired by Dinesh D'Souza, that paragon of morality who now blames "social liberals" for 9/11. There is little doubt that were it not for the wave of liberation that swept across America during the 1960's, Coulter's would have found fame and fortune unattainable. In my video, "CPAC 2007: The Unauthorized Documentary," I asked Coulter how she could reconcile her defense of the sanctity of marriage with the fact that she has had three broken engagements and has never been married. She was unable to answer my question. Instead, she made an ambiguous remark about my appearance which I assume was a sarcastic insult. Some of my friends have insisted she was genuinely enamored with me, a theory that, if true, highlights Coulter's obvious sado-masochistic tendency. Either way, her response, or lack thereof, was predictable. Coulter refused to address the gulf between her personal life and her public persona. Any acknowledgement of this contradiction would have cast her vitriolic attacks on deviant social groups as projections of her psycho-sexual issues. Like Haggard, Gannon, Sanchez or the countless right-wing hypocrites who have come and gone over the years, Coulter's contradictions are essential to understanding her reactionary posture. She is what I would call a CCC, or a Conflicted Conservative in Crisis. CCC's are aggressive toward groups they privately identify with, like sexual minorities or independent women, but they are simultaneously submissive to those who might otherwise persecute them. Thus, Coulter assiduously cultivated the approval of James Dobson, an anti-feminist demagogue who advocates "women's submission;" Sanchez enlisted in the Marines, then joined the right's campus culture war; and Haggard inveighed against homosexuality from the pulpit. These CCC's scurried away from freedom for the tight confines of an authoritarian movement. For CCC's, backlash politics is a crude form of therapy. The CCC phenomenon explains why so many of the right's most bigoted and hysterical figures are eventually unmasked as frauds. Sanchez may be drummed out of the movement after today's revelations, and Coulter may lose advertising revenue and allies after her latest paroxysm of hate, but the show will go on. So long as conservatism is propelled by the politics of resentment, it will continue to attract and generate CCC's. Update: Sanchez conducted a "candid" interview with Joemygod that is to be published later today. According to Joe, "Sanchez is no dumb bunny." We'll see...

Dems to Bush: Don't pardon Libby

The Raw Story Democratic lawmakers repond to verdict: 'Don't pardon Libby' Democratic lawmakers repond to verdict: 'Don't pardon Libby' 03/06/2007 @ 12:30 pmFiled by Ron Brynaert Update: Dean compares scandal to US attorney dismissals and Walter Reed 'cover-up,' CNN video added Democratic lawmakers are responding to the verdict in the CIA leak case trial which found former White House aide I. Lewis Libby guilty on four of five counts. Along with commenting on Libby's conviction, Democrats are also alluding to the roles that other Bush Administration officials, including Vice President Cheney, played in the "outing" of former CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson. Over at the Democratic National Committee website, the following graphic was displayed at the top of its homepage, not long after the verdict was read at noon: A Wall Street Journal blog noted the "first comment, was simply: “MERRY FITZMAS!!!!" Reid: Bush must pledge 'no pardon' A statement issued by Majority Leader Senator Harry Reid (D-NV) referred to revelations in the trial that Vice President Dick Cheney could be implicated further in the outing of former CIA operative Valerie Plame Wilson. Reid also implored President Bush not to issue a pardon for Libby. "I welcome the jury's verdict," Reid's statement said. "It's about time that someone in the Bush Administration has been held accountable for the campaign to manipulate intelligence and discredit war critics." Libby was found guilty of four of five charges, including perjury and obstruction of justice. Reid continued, "Lewis Libby has been convicted of perjury, but his trial revealed deeper truths about Vice President Cheney's role in this sordid affair." "Now President Bush must pledge not to pardon Libby for his criminal conduct," Reid's statement concluded. Pelosi: Trial provided troubling picture Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) also released a statement which called attention to the Bush Administration's alleged role in the "outing." "Today's guilty verdicts are not solely about the acts of one individual," Pelosi's statement sent to RAW STORY read. Pelosi's statement continued, "This trial provided a troubling picture of the inner workings of the Bush Administration. The testimony unmistakably revealed – at the highest levels of the Bush Administration – a callous disregard in handling sensitive national security information and a disposition to smear critics of the war in Iraq." When asked by the media whether Cheney might be the next target, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald demurred. "I do not expect to file any further charges," Fitzgerald said. Kerry: Politics of smear and fear Senator John Kerry (D-MA) also released a statement which blasted the Bush Administration for its "politics of smear and fear." "This verdict brings accountability at last for official deception and the politics of smear and fear," Kerry said in the statement sent to RAW STORY. "This trial revealed a no-holds barred White House attack machine aimed at anyone who stood in the way of their march to war with Iraq." Kerry's statement continued, "It is time for President Bush to live up to his own promises and hold accountable anyone else who participated in this smear. It is also well past time for Vice President Cheney, who according to the testimony was protected by Scooter Libby's lies, to finally acknowledge his role in this sordid episode." "I also want to thank the jury and the prosecutor for their hard work in this case," the former Democratic presidential candidate, who lost to Bush in 2004, added. Obama: It should never happen again Senator Barack Obama (D-IL), a candidate for president in 2008, released a statement which called for an end to "leaks and innuendo in pursuit of a flawed policy." "The conviction today underscores what happens when our foreign and national security policies are subverted by politics and ideology," Obama said in the statement sent to RAW STORY. "Leaks and innuendo in pursuit of a flawed policy lead to shameful episodes such as this." Obama added, "It should never happen again." Dean: Bush 'obsessed with critics' Appearing on MSNBC, DNC Chairman Howard Dean, former Vermont governor and 2004 presidential candidate, compared the scandal to the US attorney dismissals by President Bush and the "cover-up" with regards to concerns about the outpatient care for US soldiers at Walter Reed Medical Center. "I think it's a sad day," Dean said, "I'm not surprised." Dean said that the Bush Administration appears to be "more obsessed with their critics" than with doing their jobs and that, as a result, "America is suffering." The DNC chairman opined that pardoning Libby could be seen a "good way to shut him up," and that it would be a "bad thing" if Bush attempted to "short circuit" any further investigation by issuing a pardon. Dean also issued the following statement: "Today the American legal system did something the Bush Administration hasn't, by holding Scooter Libby accountable for his illegal actions. Many unanswered questions remain about the other key Bush advisors who participated in the administration's efforts to mislead the American people and smear its critics who have yet to be held accountable. Ultimately, the buck stops with President Bush." Dean on CNN: 'Tip of the iceberg' Appearing on The Situation Room later on Tuesday, Dean further explained to CNN correspondent Wolf Blitzer why Bush may be tempted to pardon Libby. "The problem is that Scooter Libby now has a -- a great incentive to tell what else was going on in the vice president's office," Dean said. "Don't forget, this is the tip of the iceberg." Dean added, "This is about the president and the vice president trying to discredit people who turned out to be right about the war in Iraq. And Scooter Libby didn't do this all by himself. The best way that the president has to shut Scooter Libby up before sentencing is to pardon him." Blitzer asked Dean why he called Libby only "the tip of the iceberg." "Because we know that the president was not truthful to the American people when he sent us to war," Dean said. "And the -- we know that politics consumes this -- this administration." While talking about Cheney's actions during the period before Plame's "outing," Dean brought up the current Army medical center scandal, as well, to call attention to the "casualty" of truth in the Bush Administration. "You know, here, you have a spectacle of the vice president of the United States circling things in newspaper articles that he didn't like, in order to discredit his -- his foes, while our kids, our young men and women in Walter Reed hospital are not getting proper medical care," Dean said on CNN. "This administration needs to stop talking about politics and start doing something about the actual problems that are facing the American people starting with those soldiers in Walter Reed. There's a lot going on in this administration that's about politics, and it's -- and the truth is a casualty in this administration." Dean was asked to specify exactly what he was calling for. "Governor, do you want to see a special prosecutor investigate the president and/or the vice president?" Blitzer asked. "Is that what I'm hearing?" "Well, no, I didn't say -- you are very good with this, Wolf, but I didn't say any of those things," Dean answered. "What I did say is, there is more to come." Dean added, "I think we ought to stay tuned. But I think pardoning -- pardoning Scooter Libby would deprive us of a potential witness at some point." The following video contains clips of Wolf Blitzer's interview with Howard Dean, while the entire transcript can be found at CNN's site

Libby conviction may haunt Bush

Libby verdict may haunt rest of Bush term - Yahoo! News Libby verdict may haunt rest of Bush term By Andy Sullivan 38 minutes ago A top White House aide's guilty verdict in an investigation tied to the Iraq war is likely to haunt President George W. Bush for the rest of his term, experts say. Speculation over a possible pardon of Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, Lewis "Scooter" Libby, began almost immediately after the verdict was announced on Tuesday. Plans for an appeal as well as a separate civil suit promise to keep the case in the news for most if not all of the 22 months Bush has left in office. Libby remains free as his lawyers seek a new trial or appeal his conviction -- a process that is likely to push back the announced sentencing date of June 5. The outcome also raised more questions about Cheney, long regarded as one of the most powerful people in the administration, prompting White House spokesman Tony Snow on Wednesday to deny the case would affect his influence. "The vice president still remains a trusted aide. The vice president is somebody upon whose counsel the president depends," he said. Colby College government professor Anthony Corrado said the case would impact Bush's ability to get things done. "It's an outcome that's going to further diminish the president's standing on Capitol Hill and make it more difficult for the administration to press its cause in its final two years here," Corrado said. University of Virginia politics professor Larry Sabato added: "The biggest problem Bush has is Iraq, and this reinforces his problems." "It just reminds people that ... they (the Bush administration) totally own this highly unpopular war," he said. INNER WORKINGS REVEALED The high-profile trial revealed the inner workings of the White House and became the latest setback for the Bush administration's war policy. It followed previous flaps over flawed intelligence on weapons of mass destruction, the failure to contain a violent insurgency and sectarian strife, prisoner abuses and an outcry over treatment of U.S. war wounded. No one is likely to face criminal charges for actually leaking CIA secrets; Libby was found guilty of lying and obstructing a probe into the affair. Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald said he didn't plan to charge anyone else in the case of Valerie Plame, the CIA operative identified after her husband accused the Bush administration of manipulating intelligence on Iraqi weapons of mass destruction to build its case for war. In the aftermath of the trial that transfixed Washington, some were suggesting Libby was merely a scapegoat for higher-ups who were running a campaign to discredit critics of the war. Many in the jury felt that other officials who leaked Plame's name to reporters, such as senior White House aide Karl Rove, should have been on trial, one juror said. "Three or four times during this trial someone in jury would say, 'What are we doing here? Why are we dealing with Libby? Where are the other guys?"' juror Denis Collins said Wednesday on ABC's "Good Morning America." Plame's lawyers said the trial would help their own civil case against Cheney, Libby and Rove, among others. "The American public learned details of how Vice President Cheney orchestrated the concerted White House effort to discredit and retaliate against Joe Wilson (news, bio, voting record)," the lawyers said. Sabato said, "This is not some minor Munchkin in the office, Libby was Cheney's eyes and ears. It's hard to believe that Cheney didn't know everything." (Additional reporting by Jeremy Pelofsky and JoAnne Allen)

Ethics still haunt GOP

Republicans could face new ethics probes - Yahoo! News Republicans could face new ethics probes By LARRY MARGASAK, Associated Press WriterWed Mar 7, 7:00 AM ET Republicans could face ethics investigations for contacting U.S. attorneys about pending cases, a jarring political development only four months after ethical lapses helped cost the GOP control of Congress. Two veteran Republican lawmakers and a top GOP leadership aide contacted prosecutors who later were fired. All three denied wrongdoing. Democratic-run committees in both the House and Senate are investigating the firings of eight U.S. attorneys. Six of those prosecutors told Congress on Tuesday they felt pressured by the interventions. The Senate ethics committee already is conducting a preliminary inquiry into the call by Sen. Pete Domenici (news, bio, voting record), R-N.M., to a prosecutor in his state. The action was required once the committee received a complaint against Domenici from a congressional watchdog group. The House's ethics panel has more discretion on starting an initial inquiry. But Majority Leader Rep. Steny Hoyer (news, bio, voting record), D-Md., said there should be one. Rep. Heather Wilson (news, bio, voting record), R-N.M., contacted the same prosecutor as Domenici. Edward Cassidy, a top aide to House Republican leader John Boehner (news, bio, voting record) of Ohio and a former ethics committee staff member, contacted a prosecutor in Washington state. The Senate's ethics manual says Senate offices should refrain from intervening in pending court actions "until the matter has reached a resolution in the courts." The House's version has similar warnings. Cassidy's case presents a potential conflict for the senior Republican on the House ethics committee, Rep. Doc Hastings (news, bio, voting record) of Washington state. Cassidy was his top aide in his personal office and on the committee. Hastings normally would play a crucial role in the evenly divided committee, in deciding whether to begin an initial investigation and appointing an investigative subcommittee. He would not comment Tuesday on whether he planned to remove himself from any committee decisions. Hoyer, a key architect of the Democrats' takeover of the House, expressed no reluctance to jump on the new Republican dilemma. "When issues are raised in the public sphere, I think the committee has a responsibility on its own, and I would hope they would do that," Hoyer told reporters. Democrats made GOP ethical misdeeds a major issue in the fall campaign. They singled out former GOP Majority Leader Tom DeLay, the subject of several ethics probes, and were handed a pre-election scandal when it was disclosed that former Rep. Mark Foley, R-Fla., made advances to former male teenage pages. The firing of eight U.S. attorneys has raised questions about how they are appointed and the circumstances under which they may be dismissed. Last year's renewal of the USA Patriot Act, the Bush administration's prime anti-terror law, contained a provision that abolished limits on how long interim prosecutors may serve. Democrats have accused the Justice Department of seeking to use the provision to bypass the Senate confirmation process. Legislation has been introduced to reverse that provision. The fired prosecutor from New Mexico, David Iglesias, told senators he had a brief telephone conversation with Domenici in late October 2006 that ended when Domenici abruptly hung up. Iglesias said he had just told the senator that indictments in a corruption case against Democrats would not be handed down before the November elections. Iglesias also said he received a call from Wilson before the election, in which she asked him about sealed indictments — a topic prosecutors cannot discuss. Wilson's question "raised red flags in my head," Iglesias said. John McKay, the fired U.S. attorney in Seattle, said he stopped Cassidy — the Hastings assistant — from asking him detailed questions about an investigation into the disputed election of Washington state's Democratic Gov. Christine Gregoire in 2004. Domenici had a much different recollection than Iglesias about his call to the prosecutor. He said in a statement that Iglesias "confirmed that our conversation was brief and that my words did not threaten him, nor did I direct him to take any course of action. While I recall, as I stated previously, that I asked Mr. Iglesias about timing of the investigation, neither I nor those who overheard my side of the brief conversation recall my mentioning the November election to him." Wilson said she called the prosecutor after a constituent "with knowledge of ongoing investigations" told her that Iglesias was intentionally delaying corruption prosecutions. "I called Mr. Iglesias and told him the allegation, though not the source," she said. "Mr. Iglesias denied delaying prosecutions. He said he had very few people to handle corruption cases. I told him that I would take him at his word, and I did. " She added, "If the purpose of my call has somehow been misperceived, I am sorry for any confusion." Hastings defended his former aide, saying Cassidy's call was "a simple inquiry and nothing more" about Washington state's close gubernatorial election. Cassidy called his call to McKay "a routine effort to determine whether allegations of voter fraud in the 2004 gubernatorial election were, or were not, being investigated by federal authorities." "As the top aide to the chairman of the House ethics committee, I understood the permissible limits on any such conversation," Cassidy said.

Media Matters: watch out for these media myths about Libby

Media Matters - Libby's guilty verdict: Media myths and falsehoods to watch for Libby's guilty verdict: Media myths and falsehoods to watch for Summary: On March 6, a federal jury found former vice presidential chief of staff I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby guilty on charges of perjury, obstruction of justice, and lying to federal investigators. In the wake of this decision, conservatives and other media figures can be expected to revive and advance numerous myths and falsehoods regarding the CIA leak case that have circulated throughout the media since Libby's indictment in October 2005. In anticipation of this misinformation, Media Matters for America has listed those baseless and false claims likely to surface in the coming days and weeks: No underlying crime was committed. Since a federal grand jury indicted Libby in October 2005, numerous media figures have stated that the nature of the charges against him prove that special counsel Patrick J. Fitzgerald's investigation of the CIA leak case found that no underlying crime had been committed. But this assertion ignores Fitzgerald's explanation that Libby's obstructions prevented him -- and the grand jury -- from determining whether the alleged leak violated federal law. There was no concerted White House effort to smear Wilson. In his October 2005 press conference announcing Libby's indictment, Fitzgerald alleged that, in 2003, "multiple people in the White House" engaged in a "concerted action" to "discredit, punish, or seek revenge against" former ambassador Joseph C. Wilson IV. In August 2006, it came to light that then-deputy secretary of State Richard Armitage was the original source for syndicated columnist Robert D. Novak's July 14, 2003, column exposing CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity. Numerous conservative media figures subsequently claimed that this revelation disproved the notion of a "concerted" White House effort to smear Wilson. But to the contrary, David Corn -- Washington editor of The Nation and co-author of Hubris (Crown, 2006) the book that revealed Armitage's role in the leak -- noted on his Nation weblog that Armitage "abetted a White House campaign under way to undermine Wilson" and that whether he deliberately leaked Plame's identity, "the public role is without question: senior White House aides wanted to use Valerie Wilson's CIA employment against her husband." Libby was not responsible for the leak of Plame's identity. Some in the media have suggested that because Libby did not discuss former CIA operative Valerie Plame's identity with Novak -- the first journalist to report she worked at the CIA -- he is not technically responsible for the leak. But such claims ignore the fact that Libby discussed Plame's CIA employment with then-New York Times reporter Judith Miller on several occasions prior to the publication of Novak's column naming Plame as a CIA operative. Libby merely "left out some facts." Some media outlets -- such as The Washington Post -- have suggested that FBI agent Deborah Bond testified at the trial that Libby simply "left out some facts" when he was interviewed by her in 2003. Specifically, the Post asserted that Bond said Libby "did not acknowledge disclosing the identity of undercover CIA officer Valerie Plame to reporters." In fact, Bond testified that Libby actually denied having leaked Plame's identity or having had any knowledge of her -- this despite the fact that two reporters had already testified that he leaked Plame's identity to them. Libby's leak was an effort to set the record straight. Critics of the CIA leak case have repeatedly claimed that the indictment stems from an effort by Libby and Vice President Dick Cheney to rebut a purportedly inaccurate attack on the administration by Wilson. According to these critics, Wilson falsely accused Cheney of having sent him to Niger to investigate reports that Iraq had attempted to purchase yellowcake uranium from the African country. In fact, Wilson, in his July 6, 2003, New York Times op-ed, did not say he was sent by Cheney. Rather, Wilson wrote that it was "agency officials" from the CIA who "asked if I would travel to Niger" and "check out" a "particular intelligence report" that "Cheney's office had questions about," so that CIA officials "could provide a response to the vice president's office." There is no evidence that the Plame leak compromised national security. Some media figures critical of the CIA leak case have attempted to downplay its significance by claiming that no evidence exists that the public disclosure of Plame's identity compromised national security. In fact, news reports have indicated that the CIA believed the damage caused by the leak "was serious enough to warrant an investigation" and that the subsequent disclosure of Plame's CIA front company likely put other agents' work at risk. Further, Fitzgerald stated that Plame's identity had been protected by the CIA "not just for the officer, but for the nation's security." And in their recently published book, Hubris, Corn and Newsweek investigative correspondent Michael Isikoff reported that, at the time of the leak, Plame was the chief of operations for the CIA's Joint Task Force on Iraq, which "mount[ed] espionage operations to gather information on the WMD programs Iraq might have." Fitzgerald is a partisan prosecutor. Over the course of the CIA leak investigation and the Libby trial, conservative media figures have attempted to cast Fitzgerald as a "prosecutor run amok" who is engaging in "the criminalization of politics." But Fitzgerald's background and prosecutorial record undermine the suggestion that his pursuit of Libby was politically motivated. Indeed, Fitzgerald is a Bush administration political appointee who, as U.S. attorney, has investigated high-level public officials from both parties, including former Illinois Gov. George Ryan (R), Chicago Mayor Richard M. Daley (D), and Illinois Gov. Rod Blagojevich (D). Fitzgerald exceeded his mandate in investigating violations beyond the IIPA. The administration's defenders also have accused Fitzgerald of exceeding his original mandate. Media figures have repeatedly asserted or implied that Fitzgerald was appointed to investigate possible violations of the 1982 Intelligence Identities Protection Act (IIPA), which prohibits the knowing disclosure of the identity of a covert intelligence officer. In fact, his mandate was far broader. The Department of Justice granted Fitzgerald "plenary" authority to investigate the "alleged unauthorized disclosure" of Plame's identity. Plame's employment with the CIA was widely known. This falsehood has taken at least two forms -- that Plame's employment with the CIA was known in the Washington cocktail party circuit and that her neighbors knew that she worked for the CIA. In fact, Fitzgerald stated in the indictment of Libby that Plame's employment was classified and "was not common knowledge outside the intelligence community," a finding he reiterated at a post-verdict press conference. Moreover, as Media Matters noted, contrary to The Washington Times' assertion that "numerous neighbors were aware that she worked for the agency," none of the neighbors cited in The Times' own news reports or in other reports said that they knew before reading the Novak column that Plame worked at the CIA. Her acquaintances told reporters that they believed she worked as a private "consultant." — J.K.

Tuesday, March 06, 2007

CPAC 2007: The Unauthorized Documentary

This video was shot by Max Blumenthal from "The Nation" magazine during the right wing yearly crap throwing festival that was held last week, dude does an excellent job getting under the con pundit skin just by confronting them and make them defend their position for example we all know Michelle Malkin right? Well if you don't know who she is I tell you who she is, Michelle wrote a book saying what America did to the Japanese during World War II you know putting them internment camp was a good thing and we should do that to Muslim Americans until we win the war on terror. Blumenthal put her on the spot during her book signing by asking her to autograph a photo of Japanese Americans locked up at one of these camps and the way she acted was priceless, she loses it not only she runs away she admits her book contain errors. Second highlight is was when Blumenthal meets up with David Horowitz, if you don't know who Horowitz he's a dude who spends millions of Richard Melon Scaife money to write hit pieces on college teachers. All he does is ramble talking points Liberals full of hate blah.. the left hate conservatives blah and accuse the left of hating him which that one is actually true David Horowitz is doucebag of the highest degree. And you see various other low level right wing pundits. After watching the video you see how fragile and paranoid the conservative movement has become since getting their ass kick back on November 7th.

Breaking News: Libby found guilty in CIA leak

Libby found guilty in CIA leak trial - Yahoo! News Libby found guilty in CIA leak trial By MICHAEL J. SNIFFEN and MATT APUZZO, Associated Press Writers2 hours, 6 minutes ago Vice President Dick Cheney's former chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was convicted Tuesday of lying and obstructing a leak investigation that reached into the highest levels of the Bush administration. Libby is the highest-ranking White House official to be convicted of a felony since the Iran-Contra scandal of the mid-1980s. The case brought new attention to the Bush administration's much-criticized handling of weapons of mass destruction intelligence in the run-up to the Iraq war. The verdict culminated a nearly four-year investigation into how CIA official Valerie Plame's name was leaked to reporters in 2003. The trial revealed how top members of the administration were eager to discredit Plame's husband, former Ambassador Joseph Wilson, who accused the administration of doctoring prewar intelligence on Iraq. Libby, who was once Cheney's most trusted adviser and an assistant to President Bush, was expressionless as the jury verdict was announced on the 10th day of deliberations. His wife, Harriet Grant, choked out a sob and sank her head. He faces up to 30 years in prison when he is sentenced June 5 but under federal sentencing guidelines is likely to face far less. Defense attorneys immediately promised to ask for a new trial or appeal the conviction. "We have every confidence Mr. Libby ultimately will be vindicated," defense attorney Theodore Wells told a throng of reporters. "We believe Mr. Libby is totally innocent and that he didn't do anything wrong." Libby did not speak to reporters. Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald, who has led the leak investigation, said no additional charges would be filed. That means nobody will be charged with the leak and Libby, who was not the source for the original column outing Plame, will be the only one to face trial. "The results are actually sad," Fitzgerald said. "It's sad that we had a situation where a high-level official person who worked in the office of the vice president obstructed justice and lied under oath. We wish that it had not happened, but it did." White House deputy press secretary Dana Perino said Bush watched news of the verdict on TV in the Oval Office. Perino said the president respected the jury's verdict but "was saddened for Scooter Libby and his family." Perino said "I would not agree" with any characterization of the verdict as embarrassing for the White House. "I think that any administration that has to go through a prolonged news story that is unpleasant and one that is difficult — when you're under the constraints and the policy of not commenting on an ongoing criminal matter — that can be very frustrating," she said. Libby was convicted of one count of obstruction, two counts of perjury and one count of lying to the FBI about how he learned Plame's identity and whom he told. Prosecutors said he learned about Plame from Cheney and others, discussed her name with reporters and, fearing prosecution, made up a story to make those discussions seem innocuous. Libby said he told investigators his honest recollections and blamed any misstatements on a faulty memory. He was acquitted of one count of lying to the FBI about his conversation with Time magazine reporter Matthew Cooper. One juror who spoke to reporters outside court said the jury had 34 poster-size pages filled with information they distilled from the trial testimony. They discerned that Libby was told about Plame at least nine times and they didn't buy the argument that he forgot all about it. "Even if he forgot that someone told him about Mrs. Wilson, who had told him, it seemed very unlikely he would not have remembered about Mrs. Wilson," the juror, Denis Collins, said. Collins, a former Washington Post reporter, said jurors wanted to hear from others involved in the case, including Bush political adviser Karl Rove, who was one of two sources for the original leak. Defense attorneys originally said both Libby and Cheney would be witnesses and Rove was on the potential witness list. "I will say there was a tremendous amount of sympathy for Mr. Libby on the jury. It was said a number of times, 'What are we doing with this guy here? Where's Rove? Where are these other guys?' " Collins said. "I'm not saying we didn't think Mr. Libby was guilty of the things we found him guilty of. It seemed like he was, as Mr. Wells put it, he was the fall guy." Though the case never proved a White House conspiracy to out Plame as retribution for Wilson's criticism, Fitzgerald showed how adamant some members of the Bush administration were to discredit Wilson. Fitzgerald provided a parade of senior administration officials and top journalists as government witnesses. Reaction to the conviction on Capitol Hill was swift. Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (news, bio, voting record) welcomed the jury's verdict and called on Bush to pledge not to pardon Libby. Before the trial began, the Justice Department had said that it had no pardon file active for Libby. "It's about time someone in the Bush Administration has been held accountable for the campaign to manipulate intelligence and discredit war critics," Reid said. Perino would not discuss Reid's pardon concerns. Wilson and Plame have sued Libby, Cheney and several other administration officials in federal court. Attorneys at the liberal watchdog group Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics, which brought the lawsuit, praised the conviction and Fitzgerald's team. "Their prosecution of a senior White House official illustrates that we are a nation of laws and that no man is above the law," attorneys said in a prepared statement. U.S. District Judge Reggie B. Walton ordered a pre-sentencing report be completed by May 15. Judges use such reports to help determine sentences. Libby will be allowed to remain free while awaiting sentencing. Sidebar: The Republicans and the right wing media are probably in full spin mode over this story, maybe this conviction leads to bigger fish getting fried but until then we have to wait and see. But I would open this post to discussion for our friends on the right maybe they can explain why was Libby convicted.

Monday, March 05, 2007

Letter to Ann Coulter

Henry Rollins write a letter to Ann Coulter. Priceless

Save the Guy James show

Before Air America, before the blog community and way before liberal talk shows became profitable there were very few voices out there speaking truth to power about the Smirk White House during the heights of post 9.11 popularity but there was Guy James. Guy fought against the blind patriotism the right exploited for political gains, he told the truth despite pressures of keeping quite or be label as anti American and most importantly he gave his listeners hope and insurance that they wasn't alone in their thinking. Guy needs help, unlike other liberal talk shows Guy depends on support from the listeners to keep his show running, Guy no longer could fund the show on his own therefore he needs listeners help to keep the show going or he's forced to closed shop. This is personal for me because I was one of those people Guy gave hope to, I remember feeling like there was no one out there that share my view I felt the country turned right wing in one day that was until I came across the Guy James show back in October of 2003, I listened to a guy spiting facts, taking on hostile right wing callers and I got a chance to hear other people that had the same worries I had and it was for me political therapy. And I'm not asking to break the bank or write checks 200 or 300 bucks but give what you can. Welcome to the Guy James Show Welcome to the Guy James Show - Find out how to contribute The White Rose Society - Guy James Show Page or mail The Guy James Show12870 Trade Way Four # 108Bonita Springs, FL 34135 please, please support the show, thank you

GOP candidates criticize shemale author comment

G.O.P. Candidates Criticize Slur by Conservative Author - New York Times
G.O.P. Candidates Criticize Slur by Conservative Author By ADAM NAGOURNEY WASHINGTON, March 3 — Three of the leading Republican presidential candidates on Saturday denounced one of their party’s best-known conservative commentators for using an antigay epithet when discussing a Democratic presidential contender at a gathering of conservatives here. The remarks by Ann Coulter, (R-ladyboy) an author who regularly speaks at conservative events, were sharply denounced by the candidates, Senator John McCain of Arizona, Rudolph W. Giuliani of New York and Mitt Romney of Massachusetts. Their statements came after Democrats, gay rights groups and bloggers raised a storm of protest over the remarks. Speaking at the Conservative Political Action Conference before an overflow crowd on Friday, Ms. Coulter said, “I was going to have a few comments on the other Democratic presidential candidate John Edwards, but it turns out you have to go into rehab if you use the word ‘faggot,’ so I — so kind of an impasse, can’t really talk about Edwards.” Mr. Edwards’s aides responded with an e-mail message that attacked Ms. Coulter and urged supporters to donate to Mr. Edwards’s campaign. “John was singled out for a personal attack because the Republican establishment knows he poses the greatest threat to their power,” said his campaign manager, David E. Bonior. “Since they have nothing real to use against him, Coulter’s resorting to the classic right-wing strategy of riling up hate to smear a progressive champion.” Ms. Coulter, asked for a reaction to the Republican criticism, said in an e-mail message: “C’mon, it was a joke. I would never insult gays by suggesting that they are like John Edwards. That would be mean.” At the conference, she said she was likely to support Mr. Romney. The criticisms by the Republican candidates put them in a difficult position because the Conservative Political Action Conference has been gathering for conservative and Republican leaders for over 25 years. The speakers this year included Vice President Dick Cheney and most of the presidential candidates, whose presence suggested the political influence the group holds in the party’s nominating process. Mr. Cheney was not at the event on Friday. Of the major Republican candidates, only Mr. McCain did not attend, but he denounced her remarks on Saturday morning. “The comments were wildly inappropriate,” said his spokesman, Brian Jones. Mr. Giuliani said, “The comments were completely inappropriate and there should be no place for such name-calling in political debate.” Kevin Madden, a spokesman for Mr. Romney, said: “It was an offensive remark. Governor Romney believes all people should be treated with dignity and respect.” Mr. Romney preceded Ms. Coulter at the event and mentioned that she was speaking later — he jokingly referred to her as a “moderate.” But he was not in the room when she spoke, Mr. Madden said.
Personally I thought Ann would hide under her rock for a while after the heat she took after sliming the Jersey Girls in her book, but it's clear that she would say anything to get a buck from her right wing sugar daddies. But what the shocking thing is that once she made that comment the seals in the room clapped now could you image if Michael Moore said something nasty about Ronnie Reagan or George W. Bush? Hell the knuckle draggers on the right tried to drag Bill Maher for a comment that wasn't his.

Looking beyond Walter Reed

Lawmaker looks beyond Walter Reed fix - Yahoo! News Lawmaker looks beyond Walter Reed fix By JOHN HEILPRIN, Associated Press Writer 58 minutes ago Substandard living conditions found at the Army's flagship veterans hospital likely exist throughout the military health care system, the head of a House panel investigating Walter Reed Army Medical Center said Monday. "We need a sustained focus here, and much more needs to be done," Rep. John Tierney (news, bio, voting record) said of a scandal enveloping Walter Reed. Charges of bureaucratic delays and poor treatment there have produced calls in Congress for quick reform. Tierney said he is afraid "these problems go well beyond the walls of Walter Reed," adding that "as we send more and more troops into Iraq and Afghanistan, these problems are only going to get worse, not better." A House Oversight and Government Reform subcommittee hearing Monday at the hospital brought a wide range of apologies from top-level Army officers and the Army's No. 2 civilian. "We have let some soldiers down," said Peter Geren, the undersecretary of the Army. Tierney, D-Mass., chairman of the panel, questioned whether problems at the facility are "just another horrific consequence" of inadequate planning that went into war in Iraq; a problem created by contracting out work there to private business, or some other cause. "This is absolutely the wrong way to treat our troops, and serious reforms need to happen... immediately," he said. Geren, who will become acting Army secretary later this week, told the panel that the revelations of poor conditions at Walter Reed had hurt the Army. Defense Secretary Robert Gates forced Army Secretary Francis Harvey to resign last week and he leaves his post on Friday. Two former commanders at the facility said they accepted responsibility for the failures. Maj. Gen. George W. Weightman, head of Walter Reed from August until he was fired last week said: "You can't fail one of these soldiers ... not one. And we did." Lt. Gen. Kevin C. Kiley, Army surgeon general and head of Walter Reed until 2004, apologized for what he called housing conditions that did "not meet our standards." He said renovations were under way. He also said a team had been sent to some 11 other installations around the country to make sure there are not similar housing problems. Regarding bureaucratic delays, Kiley said the system for outpatient care is "complex, confusing and frustrating" and that more doctors, nurses and other staff are being brought in to lower the case load and so speed the process. Lawmakers listened closely as several patients came to the hearing with stories of lax or poor treatment at Walter Reed: Staff Sgt. John Daniel Shannon, who lost his left eye and suffered traumatic brain injuries from a rifle wound, said that after he was discharged from Walter Reed, he was given a map of the grounds and eventually found his way to outpatient quarters by wandering around and asking for directions. Then, he says, he "sat in my room for a couple of weeks wondering when someone would contact" him about continuing treatment. "My biggest concern is having young men and women who have had their lives shattered in service to their country ... get taken care of," Shannon said. Annette McLeod told the committee that her husband, Cpl. Wendell McLeod, was originally sent to the wrong hospital after he was hit in the head with a steel door in Iraq and also suffered a head injury. Once at Walter Reed, she said, he suffered delays in getting outpatient tests and treatment. "My life was ripped apart the day that my husband was injured," she told the panel tearfully. The experience at Walter Reed made it "worse than anything I've had to sacrifice in my life." Addressing war veterans on Monday, Vice President Dick Cheney promised that the problems at Walter Reed will be fixed. "There will be no excuses — only action," Cheney told a gathering of the Veterans of Foreign Wars. "And the federal bureaucracy will not slow that action down." Weightman said several systems set up to monitor patient complaints and opinions had failed to uncover the problems. An anonymous survey at the end of January, for instance, showed patient satisfaction with case workers and physicians at 90 percent, he said. "Almost none of these issues were raised," he said. "That's obviously a failure ... get the feedback we need." The controversy started last month with a series of stories in The Washington Post, but lawmakers said reports of the failures go back several years. Rep. Henry A. Waxman, D-Calif., said that in addition to several government audits, there was a February 2005 Salon magazine story on poor conditions at the hospital's psychiatric ward; a 2006 report on problems screening people with brain injuries and a 2005 think tank report criticizing the complex disability program. 'My question is: Where have you been?" Tierney asked, when the third panel of witnesses took their seats at the witness table. They were Geren, Army Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Schoomaker, and his vice chief, Gen. Richard Cody. "We've got all these reports with all these alarm bells going off ... and the information doesn't seem to get up the line of command," said Waxman. In a letter Sunday to Defense Secretary Robert Gates, Sen. Charles Schumer (news, bio, voting record), D-N.Y., asked for an independent commission, possibly headed by former Secretary of State Colin Powell, to investigate all post-combat medical facilities and recommend changes. President Bush last week had ordered a comprehensive review of conditions. I remember back during the 90s every two bit conservative pundit were screaming Clinton was hurting the army, now they're very slient on what's going on over at Walter Reed it shows that conservatives only care about the army when there's a (D) after the president's name.