Glenn Beck likes to say that "[t]here is no one more pro-Israel or more pro-Jew than I am." But what exactly does that mean?
Over the past month, hundreds of thousands of Israelis (out of a population of about 8 million) haveprotested high housing costs and other economic issues. A Haaretz poll from late July found that fully 87 percent of Israeli respondents supported the protests; just 9 percent opposed the protests.
But Glenn Beck disagrees. Last week, he and his co-hosts blasted the protesters, whom they characterized as "obviously from the hard left." They sarcastically described calls to "enshrine the right to housing in the law" as something that "worked out well for the Soviets" and mocked proposals for rent control.
Beck went on to speculate that the protests are being orchestrated by some sort of "leftist global financing" and that the protesters are working with Islamic extremists.
Listen:
In other words, Beck apparently thinks 87 percent of Israelis support a movement that is collaborating with Islamic extremists and a shadowy network of international "leftists."
Beck has also criticized large portions of the American Jewish community. Earlier this year, 400 rabbis signed an open letter criticizing Beck's inappropriate rhetoric about the Holocaust and his falseclaims that George Soros collaborated with the Nazis. In response, Beck went on the attack. He falsely claimed that the letter was signed only by "Reformed rabbis" and insisted that Reform Judaism is "more about politics" than about faith, which he said makes it similar to "radicalized Islam."
Listen:
6 percent who consider themselves to be Conservative.
The Reform movement, which includes 1.5 million Jews, is the largest denomination of North American Jews. According to the National Jewish Population Survey 2000-01, 35 percent of American
The Anti-Defamation League called Beck's Reform Judaism comments "highly offensive and outrageous" and accused Beck of "bigoted ignorance." Beck was forced to apologize.
Jewsconsider themselves to be Reform, compared to 10 percent who consider themselves to be Orthodox and 2
In May, Beck complained that "the Jewish community" wasn't condemning President Obama's "absolute betrayal" of Israel. Beck declared that "the Jewish community seems to be giving him a pass yet again" and asked, "How is that possible?"
Beck also has a long history of mainstreaming anti-Semitism. He has promoted the writings and statements of anti-Semites like Eustace Mullins, Elizabeth Dilling, and former Malaysian Prime Minister Mahathir Mohamad. He engaged in a series of attacks on Soros that were steeped in anti-Semitic stereotypes and imagery. In January, Beck infamously identified nine villains who, over the past century, have conspired to control the population; eight of them happened to be Jewish.
So perhaps it's unsurprising that in promoting his upcoming Restoring Courage rally in Jerusalem, Beck is trumpeting the support of Billy Graham, who once said the following to then-President Richard Nixon:
GRAHAM: A lot of the Jews are great friends of mine. They swarm around me and are friendly to me, because they know that I am friendly to Israel and so forth. But they don't know how I really feel about what they're doing to this country, and I have no power and no way to handle them.
By Stephen C. Webster
Fox News personality Glenn Beck believes the Jews were responsible for killing the biblical messiah Jesus Christ, and Gosh Darn It, if the Christian savior had been more like Barack Obama he'd have "come back and made the Jews pay for what they did."
That's just the tip of a bizarre rant recently aired by News Corporation, which featured the chalkboard-handy host once again assailing Christian social justice efforts, which many faithful see as core to their sacrament. In the process, however, Beck revealed what one prominent reverend called a fundamental "misunderstanding" of scripture, as well as an apparent detachment from the English language when it comes to the word "victim."
First of all, as the story goes, Jews did not kill Jesus. The Roman empire had him executed after Jewish religious leaders became worked into a frenzy over his ideas - or so the New Testament claims. Armed Roman guards allegedly beat and lashed him, then hung him on a cross until death.
Indeed, claiming as fact that Jews killed Jesus would seem to indicate that Beck has adopted a meme otherwise endemic to antisemitic thought and literature. The implication that Romans were stalwarts of law and reason who merely appeased the bloodthirsty Jewish mob was a vital component of Nazi propaganda.
Beck also suggests that calling Jesus the "victim" of a violent and oppressive system is "an abomination." Jesus, he insists, was really a "conqueror" who chose death at the hands of his own people in order to overcome the wages of sin for all humanity.
While an advanced theological argument could potentially be rendered to support this statement, all traces of logic seem missing. By its principle definition, what Beck is describing is victimhood. The word "victim" literally means a living being that is scarified to a deity.
A nearly universal cornerstone of Christian theology holds that Christ's death washed away man's sin in God's eyes, therefore his sacrifice is a key moment in their religious rite. Logically, it would follow that without the fundamental construction of the Christian God, who measures ill-deeds against humanity and threatens impure souls with eternal punishment, there would be no such thing as "sin" -- meaning the sacrifice chosen by Christ was to satisfy a deity. Such is the first definition of the word "victim," according to Merriam-Webster's dictionary.
The alternate definition of "victim" also contradicts Beck's application of the word. Webster further defines "victim" as "one that is acted on and usually adversely affected by a force or agent". In this understanding of the word, the conservative opinion host would seem to be suggesting that being beaten and murdered by armed thugs is not a force or agent acting on an individual in an adverse manner.
Instead, the juxtaposition of victim and conqueror is convenient for Beck in that he's trying to refute the intrinsic nature of many Christians' beliefs that the poor and needy should be comforted. Instead, the television talker opines that "redistribution of wealth" is nowhere to be found in the religious tome.
But even this rings hollow. The first generation of Christians, spoken of in the book of Acts, took it upon themselves to sell all their possessions and bring the proceeds to Christ's apostles so they might redistribute the wealth to all believers.
Acts 2:44-45 says, "All that believed were together, and had all things in common; And sold their possessions and goods, and parted them to all men, as every man had need."
The notion is multiplied by Acts 4:34-37, which adds: "There was not a needy person among them, for as many as owned lands or houses sold them and brought the proceeds of what was sold. They laid it at the apostles' feet, and it was distributed to each as any had need. There was a Levite, a native of Cyprus, Joseph, to whom the apostles gave the name Barnabas (which means 'son of encouragement'). He sold a field that belonged to him, then brought the money, and laid it at the apostles' feet."
In the spirit of the one they called a messiah, the first Christian church willingly shared their wealth with fellow believers. In this same vein, legendary author Kurt Vonnegut once opined, "'Socialism' is no more an evil word than 'Christianity.' Socialism no more prescribed Joseph Stalin and his secret police and shuttered churches than Christianity prescribed the Spanish Inquisition. Christianity and socialism alike, in fact, prescribe a society dedicated to the proposition that all men, women and children are created equal, and shalt not starve."
Facts of language and scripture considered, Beck's unusual claims about Christian theology seem to be, at best, misplaced.
A core Biblical command is to follow Jesus' example of humility, not of conquering, and to show compassion for the least of those in our midst. A different commentator, the Apostle Paul, quickly sets straight Beck's account of Christian service: “Your attitude should be the same as that of Christ Jesus, who being in very nature God did not consider equality with God something to be grasped, but made himself nothing, taking the very nature of a servant, being made in human likeness. And being found in appearance as a man, he humbled himself and became obedient to death—even death on a cross.”
People may not disagree with Beck, as he said last night, because he is Mormon. But many Christians will disagree with him because he insinuates Christianity is nothing but a pull-yourself-up-from-your-bootstraps spirituality and ignores the church's long tradition of working for the plight of the powerless.
It's certainly not the first time Beck has crossed the line with Christians, many of whom are core to the conservative political movements that make up a vast cross-section of Beck's audience. In March, after the Fox News personality claimed that "social justice" is code for Nazi authoritarianism, many religious groups took him to task, lashing back in defense of their efforts to aid the poor.
Ready with a retort was Rev. Jim Wallis, a Christian leader in Washington, D.C. who spoke with ABC News.
"Brother Glenn, let's dispense with personal attacks," he said. "I don't know you. I have no reason to attack you. But you made a statement here that needs a serious conversation. ... I know you're used to monologues, but when you say things like this, you invite a dialogue. What do you say about Dr. Martin Luther King Jr., what do you say about Desmond Tutu, about Mother Teresa, what do you say to the reverends and rabbis who gave their lives to social justice because that is their faith?"
Speaking with the New York Times, Wallis added: "What he has said attacks the very heart of our Christian faith, and Christians should no longer watch his show. [...] His show should now be in the same category as Howard Stern."
Rev. Canon Peg Chemberlin, who presides over the National Council of Churches of Christ USA, further told ABC that Beck's charges seem "ridiculous" and reveal a fundamental "misunderstanding" of scripture.
"He's speaking on behalf of his political views and trying to take out of the biblical text the things that are going to oppose his political views," she said. "This is primarily a political motivation. ... It's not that Christians haven't been Nazis and socialists, but we're not talking about political parties here. We're talking about 2,000-year-old gospel."
Ultimately, these silly claims boil down to Beck's apparent goal of convincing his viewers that Obama is a secret harbinger of "liberation theology"; that the president of the United States is a covert Nazi who has come to redistribute all your wealth.
Richard Lawson over at Gawker offered perhaps the most cutting response to Beck's latest assault on Christianity's core tenets, suggesting the host has just gone "insaner and insaner" as the Obama administration progresses.
"Can you believe that there is someone on national television talking about this stuff, in this manner, every day and lots of people watch it in 2010?" he asked. "It's like a Terry Gilliam movie. Only darker."
Beck's rant on Christianity begins at the 6:00 minute mark, in this video broadcast by Fox News on July 13, 2010.
by Jeremy Schulman
