Fox News' Neil Cavuto relied on an attorney who was reprimanded by the Illinois Supreme Court for ethical violations to help further the right-wing media's case that Justice Elena Kagan should recuse herself from the upcoming hearing on the health care reform law on ethical grounds.
Several legal ethics experts and law professors have thrown cold water on the conservative media campaign to call on Kagan to recuse herself.
What Cavuto failed to point out about his expert witness, Chicago-area attorney Kelly Saindon, was that the Illinois Supreme Court suspended her for one month in 2010 because she "engaged in professional misconduct by violating state ethics law":
Ms. Saindon, who was licensed in 1998, was suspended for thirty days. Over a three year period, she neglected two civil cases and made false statements to her employer and a court regarding actions that she claimed to have taken on the matters. In one of the cases, she billed a client for work where there was no verifiable evidence that the work had been performed. The suspension is effective on June 7, 2010.
Today, the Wall Street Journal reported on more than a dozen Republican lawmakers who voted against the stimulus last year but subsequently “supported stimulus-funding requests” submitted by their constituents to federal agencies. One such lawmaker was Rep. Jean Schmidt (R-OH), who said she didn’t believe “that it would create the jobs that were promised.” In November, she even issued a call to “recall the stimulus funds that have not been spent.” Of course, Schmidt wasn’t so concerned about the federal deficit to turn down supporting “funding requests from local organizations training workers for energy-efficiency projects.”
Today, Fox News’ Neil Cavuto pushed her on her hypocrisy. Schmidt spun all sorts of circles trying to justify her move, saying that she would still “return that money to the Treasury” if she could, but the “genie is out of the bottle.” Cavuto repeatedly asked her how Republicans were any different from Democrats, pointed out how what they were doing was “offensive” to some folks, and hit her for sending a “mixed message.”
Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-UT) went on next and defended Schmidt: “She’s being very genuine in saying, ‘Look, I wouldn’t have voted for the stimulus.’ … But if she’s going to be held accountable, and the people in her district and the people in the entire country are going to have to pay for it, well then yes, certainly the Democrats aren’t suggesting that the stimulus dollars go to just the Democratic counties.” “You’re being very selective in your rage here,” concluded Cavuto. Watch it:
Democrats were never saying that all the money should go to Democratic districts; they were saying that Republicans should have been helping to bring money to all districts without simultaneously spouting political attacks claiming that the stimulus wasn’t going to “create any jobs.”
Also in the interview, Chaffetz claimed he wasn’t one of the lawmakers begging for stimulus handouts:
CAVUTO: Did constituents seek you out and say, “Could you get funding for me for this,” and did you turn them down? Yes or no.
CHAFFETZ: Well, in general, yes, I did turn them down.
Chaffetz must have forgotten about the letter he and other Utah lawmakers sent the Interior Department “on behalf of the Provo River Water Users Association seeking $95 million in [stimulus] funds.”
MCL comment: I got nothing to say but here's the best comment I saw under this story
P.D. says: LOL! It’s really bad for Repugs when CAVUTO calls them out for their hypocrisy.
