Showing posts with label fake right wing outrage. Show all posts
Showing posts with label fake right wing outrage. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 31, 2013

'Black on black crime' and conservative ethnocentrism

BY /Detroit News blog
After the acquittal of George Zimmerman in the murder of Trayvon Martin, I penned an article on the Bizarro World the conservative media has created where racism no longer exists in the U.S. – except for black racism against whites. “If there’s one thing conservatives hate, it’s when they are called out for being racist,” I began in that post.
Boy, did the commenters prove me right.
The tone was varied but the vitriol was obvious. My personal favorites were the suggestion that I “become an expat” and another calling me a “lying sack of (expletive).” While these are both eloquently stated solid arguments, they leave little in the way of substantive conversation. But there were two points that did merit further discussion: cherry-picking data and “black on black crime.”
First, contrary to the conservative media spin on this legal case, there was a national interest in a young man being murdered and no one being charged for his death – even though the murderer admitted to pulling the trigger. If Trayvon Martin were your son or daughter wouldn’t you want someone to be arrested for their death? Wouldn’t you want a trial to determine if a jury believed the Stand Your Ground defense held up in court?
The attention in this case was not that a “white” guy killed a “black” kid – as many would have you believe. It was a commentary on the failure of the justice system – in particular how African Americans are often on the receiving end of these injustices.
Some commenters took issue with my statistics. While true, they felt my application was insincere because I didn’t present additional information – as though the conservative media they parrot is known for their thorough analysis of data.
For example Ann Coulter stated “half of all murders and a majority of robberies are committed by blacks” and then goes on to talk about how George Zimmerman followed Trayvon Martin because of burglaries in the area. By using the statistics for murders and robberies Ann is attempting to paint African Americans as inherently criminal, because if she used statistics regarding burglaries she would have had to note that whites, not blacks, commit the vast majority of burglaries.
Rather than question her manipulation of data, the conservative media runs with the story and we get a new conservative talking point: “Black on black crime.”
Bill O’Reilly, for example, stated that 91 perent of homicides against African Americans were committed by other African Americans. He went on to say this number was “astronomical” and compared these killings to a “Holocaust.” It should also be noted that 85 percent of homicides against whites were committed by other whites. Odd that 91 percent is tantamount to genocide – yet 85 percent isn’t worth talking about.
The reality is the “black on black crime” is just a way for some people to justify their racism. If preventing murders had a singular, universally-accepted solution then murder rates would be a relevant stat. Unfortunately, the murder rate is the result of many circumstances which means improvements in this statistic will require an array of changes. For instance;
According to a study by the Ohio State University, “the violent crime rate in highly disadvantaged black areas was 22 per 1,000 residents, not much different from the 20 per 1,000 rate in similar white communities.”
So while conservatives whine that black leaders aren’t addressing the “black on black crime” issue, the reality is that black leaders have been pounding the pavement for years about the need to improve circumstances for the African American community which would ameliorate the crime statistics conservatives claim black leaders are ignoring.
If conservative America truly wants to put claims of racism in the rear view mirror they have to stop having conversations that begin with, “I’m not racist, but blacks are criminals,” and start considering the plight of African Americans when whites aren’t involved.

Thursday, August 09, 2012

How The Media Made The Priorities USA Attack Ad Matter


By Aviva Shen/Think Progress
Cable news is giving a controversial new ad attacking Romney an unintentional bump in visibility. Priorities USA, the super PAC supporting Barack Obama, released“Understands” on Tuesday in just five battleground states: Florida, Iowa, Pennsylvania, Virginia and Ohio. But the spot, which controversially links the death of the wife of a laid off steelworker to Romney’s actions as CEO of Bain Capital, quickly went national when cable news shows replayed the ad 60 times in two days.
Priorities USA spent slightly more than a million dollars on TV ads this month. “Understands” is its fifth ad in a campaign focusing on Romney’s tenure at Bain Capital. It features former GST Steel worker Joe Soptic, who describes how his wife died after they lost their health insurance.
Watch it:
Romney’s campaign called the ad “dishonest” and “contemptible.” Mark Halperin of Time Magazine lamented, “It seems that for some Democrats, given the attacks the President has taken, nothing is out of bounds in going after Romney at this point.”
Sensing controversy, cable news outlets replayed the ad, by ThinkProgress’ estimate, 60 times in two days. Fox News and Fox Business provided the bulk of the coverage, mentioning and playing clips of the ad 26 times since Tuesday. CNN and MSNBC played it 15 and 12 times respectively.
Priorities USA senior strategist Bill Burton told the Huffington Post that “Understands” has been “wildly successful” in focusing the conversation on Romney’s impact on the middle class. And the super PAC is getting far more bang for its buck thanks to the free media coverage.
To put the Priorities USA ad buy in perspective, conservative outside groups spent $144 million on swing state TV ads as of the third week in July. Democratic groups, led by Priorities USA, have spent $20 million.
The success of “Understands” can be read as a lesson to future political campaigns: launch hyperbolic attacks on your opponent, and the media will reward you with millions of dollars in free air time.
UPDATE
This piece has been updated to more accurately reflect Priority USA’s ad expenditures.

UPDATE
The New York Times is reporting the Priorities USA ad has never actually aired on broadcast TV.

Tuesday, September 13, 2011

Shockingly Petty: News Corp. Outlets Attack Obama Over Paper Clip

by Todd Gregory

In the annals of mindless partisan sniping, this may place at the top.
This morning, Fox & Friends joined the New York Post in attacking President Obama for using a paper clip. Read that again: They attacked Obama for using a paper clip.
The Post's story today on Obama's jobs bill is headlined "O gives jobs 'clip' service; $447B 'tax hike' plan bound by chintzy fastener," and its first two paragraphs attack Obama for his choice of document fasteners:
President Obama's plan to reverse the nation's staggering jobless rate is held together with a paper clip!
"Here it is," Obama said, waving a copy of his jobs plan during a ceremony in the White House Rose Garden yesterday, an enormous paper clip binding the pages together.
Witness the madness:
The accompanying photo's caption reads, "President Obama, joined by VP Joe Biden, yesterday wields a copy of his jobs plan - with a giant paper clip."
Fox & Friends co-host Steve Doocy repeated this attack at the top of the show today -- right down to using the word "chintzy" -- while the on-screen graphic read "Obama's 'Clip' Service":
DOOCY: Meanwhile, come and get your copy. President Obama's jobs bill, hot off the presses -- at Kinko's? Hundreds of billions in tax hikes and new spending bound together with a chintzy clip. Look at that thing.
BRIAN KILMEADE (co-host): Right.
DOOCY: What's that about?
KILMEADE: We've never had the word "chintzy" in the cold open before.
GRETCHEN CARLSON (co-host): We're in a recession.
So, the question here is, what would these right-wing outlets prefer? That Obama use a more costly way to hold together a sheaf of papers, like a bound copy of the bill?
Wouldn't that constitute the always-hated government waste?
In all seriousness, this nicely illustrates the right-wing media's willingness to attack Obama over literally anything, including his use of a paper clip.