Showing posts with label making stuff up. Show all posts
Showing posts with label making stuff up. Show all posts

Thursday, September 26, 2013

Rick Snyder Campaign Ad Touts State Recovery Over Images Of Broke Detroit

By Kate Abbey-Lambertz/Huffington Post Detroit

With the Michigan gubernatorial race more than 13 months away, Republican Gov. Rick Snyder's first campaign ad was released Tuesday, a one-minute spot that draws attention to his role in resuscitating the state's economy. Snyder is receiving more attention than ever from the Republican party, causing at least one GOP presidential advisor to say this weekend that he "could be a top tier candidate for president" if he's reelected in 2014.
The "Michigan Is Back" ad (see above) starts in 2010 with grim, sepia-toned photos of Detroit in 2010 when Michigan was "50th out of 50. Dead last," according to the narrator. Enter Snyder, who last campaigned as "One Tough Nerd" and returns now as "One Successful Nerd": with his steering, Michigan is bouncing back, and Detroit returns to close out the minute-long spot with triumphant, aerial images.
"In record time, Michigan is back on a solid foundation," the narrator says.
Snyder has long touted his commitment to improving the economy, creating jobs and balancing the budget, so his ad's claims are nothing surprising. But there are a few elements that miss the mark:
  • "Michigan's economy: best in 10 years. Best employment numbers in four years": The state has seen job growth over the last several years, with the latest month adding 8,000 new payroll jobs. But best employment numbers? The ad references a March article in the Detroit News as the source, which doesn't seem to take into account that in the last three months, theunemployment rate has risen, reaching 9 percent in August, the fourth-worst in the country. (To be fair, it is better than last August's rate of 9.3 percent or the August 2009 record of 14.2 percent in Michigan.)
  • "This new governor has kept his word. Ignored politics": One of the complaints most often leveled against Snyder by opponents is that he hasn'tkept his word. Despite repeating numerous times that right-to-work was not on his agenda, he signed the divisive legislation last year. And though he won votes from Democrats in 2010 with his promise to focus on economic recovery over social issues, many saw his decision to sign a ban on domestic partner benefitsfor state employees and stricter abortion laws as bowing to pressure from legislators on his side of the aisle.
  • Photos of Detroit blight make way for magnificent cityscapes: It's an easy argument to make that the ad ties Snyder's leadership to an improving Detroit. Unfortunately, that hasn't happened yet: Detroit is broke, and locked in bankruptcy proceedings. Though Snyder has cited Detroit's bankruptcy filing as a way to stop its downward spiral and "move forward and upward," the current situation is grim for residents, and the short-term effects are more likely to first hit downsized city employees and pensioners who may see cuts to benefits.
According to the Associated Press, the ad will run for two weeks on cable and network stations.
Snyder is leading Democrat challenger Mark Schauer by eight points, according to a recent poll.
Schauer's campaign manager issued a statement Tuesday after Snyder's ad appeared. "It’s unprecedented for an incumbent to be spending money on a political ad more than a year before an election," BJ Neidhardt said. "It’s clear candidate Snyder is desperate to repair the damage he’s done to his own brand."

Friday, July 12, 2013

Fox Pushes Pro-Walmart Myths To Bash D.C. Living Wage Bill

Thursday, May 16, 2013

Fox Distorts Obama's Response To IRS Report In Order To Justify Calls For A Special Prosecutor


 EMILY ARROWOOD/Media Matters For America


Fox News ignored President Obama's explicit demand for accountability in the wake of news that the Internal Revenue Service applied extra scrutiny to conservative groups. The network's omission gave it cover to accuse Obama of not taking the IRS's actions seriously and to call for a special prosecutor.
Obama first addressed the IRS controversy during a May 13 joint press conference with British Prime Minister David Cameron, where he condemned the IRS's behavior with the caveat, "If, in fact, IRS personnel engaged in the kind of practices that had been reported," then "that's outrageous and there's no place for it. And they have to be held fully accountable."
After the Inspector General published its report on the IRS's actions, concluding the agency applied "inappropriate criteria" to conservative applicants, Obama granted the IRS no such caveat. He released a statement definitively naming the IRS's actions "intolerable and inexcusable" and directing action to be taken to hold those responsible accountable:
I have now had the opportunity to review the Treasury Department watchdog's report on its investigation of IRS personnel who improperly targeted conservative groups applying for tax-exempt status.  And the report's findings are intolerable and inexcusable.  The federal government must conduct itself in a way that's worthy of the public's trust, and that's especially true for the IRS.  The IRS must apply the law in a fair and impartial way, and its employees must act with utmost integrity.  This report shows that some of its employees failed that test.
I've directed Secretary Lew to hold those responsible for these failures accountable, and to make sure that each of the Inspector General's recommendations are implemented quickly, so that such conduct never happens again.
Yet the next day, America Live host Megyn Kelly and Fox's digital political editor Chris Stirewalt pretended Obama issued no such condemnation.
Instead, Kelly claimed that even after the IG's report was released, "we still have the president saying, 'Well, if they did it, if they did it, if they did it." She ranted, "I don't understand, more so today than the other day, why the president used that word 'if.' 'If these people did this, if these people did that.' Now that I've seen the Inspector General report -- and you're telling me -- now Fox News just got it last night. But other news organizations had it leaked to them early. You're telling me President Obama couldn't have got it when it was complete on Monday?"
Kelly and Stirewalt used their mischaracterization of Obama's response to call for a special prosecutor into the IRS's actions. Stirewalt told Kelly that if he were the president, he would "find a Republican of good standing" to appoint as an independent investigator. Kelly responded with the charge, "Where is the harm to this administration, if as these IRS employees state, no one outside of the IRS had anything to do with this, this was just IRS employees deciding to target conservatives. So if the White House and no one else had anything to do with it, where is the harm? Why doesn't the president just say 'absolutely'?"

Friday, April 12, 2013

Republicans Mangle Facts To Attack Obama’s Missile Defense Budget

By Hayes Brown/Think Progress

Republicans in Congress came out swinging against what they label as the Obama administration’s cuts to military spending in its new budget, specifically citing the threat North Korea’s missiles pose as a reason to preserve missile defense spending. A close read of the Pentagon’s weapon procurement plans, however, show an increase in spending to the missile defense programs most closely related to countering North Korea.
Rep. Doug Lamborn (R-CO) made headlines on Thursday when he inadvertently revealed a still secret Defense Intelligence Agency asessment of North Korea’s nuclear weapons program. In one segment of the DIA’s assessment, which was mistakenly labeled as unclassified in the copy provided to Congress, the Pentagon spy agency determined North Korea “has nuclear weapons capable of delivery by ballistic missiles; however, the reliability will be low.”
Lamborn defended the disclosure after the meeting, as he was worried that the Obama administration isn’t doing enough to fund missile defense:
“My whole goal in bringing this to light was to make sure we don’t cut missile defense spending,” the congressman said. “At the worst possible time, the President’s budget does exactly that.”
Republicans like Rep. Howard “Buck” McKeon (R-CA), Chairman of the House Armed Services Committee, and Rep. Randy Forbes (R-VA) also seized on the North Korean crisis to attack the Obama administration’s proposed Fiscal Year 2014 budget on Friday — despite the fact that baseline spending is actually up by $1 billion. And while missile defense spending is cut $550 million in the President’s proposal, those cuts are primarily due to cancelling the Medium Extended Air Defense System, which the Pentagon has said it doesn’t want. In fact, Lamborn’s specific worry so far as it relates to North Korea is concerned is demonstrably false.
According to the Under Secretary of Defense (Comptroller)’s FY 2014 Program Acquisition Costs by Weapon System, requested spending for the programs related to protecting against North Korea has actually increased. The Department of Defense request for the AEGIS ballistic missile defense system was $1.51 billion, higher than the FY13 request of $1.38 billion. Likewise, funding for the Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (THAAD) system was bumped up to $850 million, an increase of $72.3 million dollars from the FY13 request. The well-known PATRIOT air and missile defense system was also slated for an increase in funding to finance an upgrade, at the rate of $609 million more than last year’s request.
Contrary to the Republican congressmen’s hand-wringing, the Obama administration has done anything but cut missile defense spending related to North Korea since the crisis began earlier this year. Since March alone, the Pentagon has ordered not one, but two ships equipped with missile defense technology to patrol the Korean peninsula’s coasts. Secretary of Defense Chuck Hagel also announced the revival of a battery of interceptors based in Alaska, as well as adding new sets to California, providing additional defense to the United States’ West Coast, at the cost of around $1 billion. Deployment of the THAAD system to Guam was ordered ahead of schedule as well, highlighting the gravity the Obama administration has given the situation.
What remains up for debate, however, is just how reliable these various systems are against ballistic missiles. The THAAD program’s ability to target medium- and long-range missiles has been questioned and even the highly successful AEGIS system only boasts an 82 percentsuccess rate. In any event, the threat that North Korea’s missiles pose to the mainland United States remains questionable at best, given the large number of failed tests its intercontinental ballistic missile program has seen.
Likewise, DIA’s assessment surrounding Pyongyang’s state of nuclear technology remains the conclusion of just one intelligence agency and one with “moderate confidence” in the finding at that. Director of National Intelligence James Clapper on Thursday made that clear in a statement, saying “the statement read by [Lamborn] is not an Intelligence Community assessment.”

Friday, January 11, 2013

Three Things The NRA Wants You To Believe About Biden’s Gun Safety Task Force That Aren’t True


By Annie-Rose Strasser/Think Progress
On Thursday, the National Rifle Association (NRA) blasted the Obama administration for undermining Americans’ Second Amendment rights just moments after its representatives met with Vice President Joe Biden and the White House task force to reduce gun violence.
Two years ago, the NRA wouldn’t even meet with President Obama and the group’s CEO and executive vice president Wayne LaPierre warned that he would confiscate “our firearms” and undermine America’s greatness. In a statement following Thursday’s meeting, the group demonstrated that it’s still not interested in reducing gun crimes, offering three misleading claims about its intentions:
1. The NRA was “prepared to have a meaningful conversation.” The NRA claimed that it’s willing to consider “school safety, mental health issues, the marketing of violence to our kids and the collapse of federal prosecutions of violent criminals.” The glaring omission in that list is any action involves the sale of guns and ammunition. It’s the same tactic they tried in their widely-panned press conference where they went so far as to blame hurricanes, but not guns. The resistance to any gun violence prevention measures that involveactual firearms shows that the NRA really wasn’t interested in a “meaningful conversation” where all options were on the table.
2. The White House has “an agenda to attack the Second Amendment.” Despite LaPierre’s paranoid insistence that the White House was lulling gun owners into a false sense of security by not passing any gun laws during his first four years, the Obama administration actually expanded gun rights in its first four years by loosening restrictions for concealed carry on federal grounds. Both Biden and Obama have insisted that they have no intention of changing the right to bear arms — rather, they simply want to create restrictions that make it harder for murderers to acquire their weapon of choice.
3. The “Administration continues to insist on pushing failed solutions.” There’s really no proof that universal background checks, restrictions on military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines, and expanded mental health services are “failed solutions.” In fact, evidence points to the opposite: Since the repeal of the assault weapons ban, mass shootings have drastically increased and studies show that the firepower of gunmen (how many rounds they shoot, and how quickly they shoot them) has jumped significantly.
Biden plans to deliver his suggestions for possible gun violence prevention laws to Obama on Tuesday. On Friday, he will meet with the entertainment and television industries. It’s likely that will be a more positive meeting, since representatives have signalled they will be more receptive to Biden’s case. In a statement, they wrote, “We welcome the opportunity to share that history and look forward to doing our part to seek meaningful solutions.” That’s despite that videogames and movies, unlike guns, can’t kill people.

Friday, October 12, 2012

No, six studies did not debunk the Tax Policy Center’s finding on the Romney tax plan


Dylan Matthews/The Washington Post
Paul Ryan repeated his campaign’s talking point that six studies have debunked the Tax Policy Center’s claim that it is “mathematically impossible” 

Paul Ryan repeated his campaign’s talking point that six studies have debunked the Tax Policy Center’s claim that it is “mathematically impossible” for Romney to implement all his tax cuts, achieve revenue neutrality, not raise taxes on the middle class, and not raise taxes on investments.
I can’t believe we have to keep saying this, but no, six studies did not say that. One study, from Harvard’s Martin Feldstein, only found that the Romney plan is possible by fiddling with the definition of “middle class”, and confirmed TPC’s finding under the definition TPC used. Another, from AEI’s Matt Jensen, found that if you subject some investment income, namely interest on state and local bonds, to taxes, the plan need not raise middle class taxes. But that leaves TPC’s claim untouched. Another, from Princeton’s Harvey Rosen, relied on implausibly high estimates of the growth effects of the Romney tax plan, and even then confirmed the TPC finding when comparing the plan to a baseline where the Bush tax cuts expire. And another, from the Heritage Foundation’s Charles Dubay, is based on a misestimation of the cost of an obscure estate tax provision.
What’s more, not all of these are actual studies. Jensen’s critique, for example, came in the form of a blog post. That says nothing about its quality, just that the Romney campaign’s characterization is a bit odd. Only three working papers or studies – one from Rosen, one from Dubay, and one from Feldstein – attempt to rebut the TPC study, and none succeed in rebutting TPC’s actual points.
In short, the Romney plan is mathematically impossible. Biden is right. Ryan is wrong.

At The Vice Presidential Debate: Ryan Told 24 Myths In 40 Minutes


By Igor Volsky/Think Progress
Paul Ryan spoke for 40 of the 90 minutes during Thursday night’s vice presidential debate and managed to tell at least 24 myths during that time:
1) “It took the president two weeks to acknowledge that [the Libya attack] was a terrorist attack.” Obama used the word “terrorism” to describe the killing of Americans the very next day at the Rose Garden. “No acts of terror will ever shake the resolve of this great nation, alter that character, or eclipse the light of the values that we stand for,” Obama said in a Rose Garden statement on September 12.
2) “The administration was blocking us every step of the way. Only because we had strong bipartisan support for these tough [Iran] sanctions were we able to overrule their objections and put them in spite of the administration.” Even the Israeli President has effusively praisedPresident Obama’s leadership on getting American and international sanctions on Iran, which have significantly slowed Iran’s progress.
3) “Medicare and Social Security are going bankrupt. These are indisputable facts.” [T]he possibility of Medicare going bankrupt is — and historically has been — greatly exaggerated. In fact, if no changes are made, Medicare would still be able to meet 88 percent of its obligations in 2085. Social Security is fully funded for another two decades and could pay 75 percent of its benefits thereafter. There is also an easy way to ensure the program’s long-term solvency without large changes or cuts to benefits.
4) “The vice president was in charge of overseeing this. $90 billion in green pork to campaign contributors and special interest groups.” Multiple reviews, including an independent review of all Department Of Energy loan programs by Herb Allison –- finance chair for McCain for President 2008 –- have found no “pork” in the stimulus’ funding of green projects, concluding that the loans were not steered to friends or family, as Ryan claims.
5) “Was it a good idea to spend taxpayer dollars on electric cars in Finland, or on windmills in China?” As PolitiFact has pointed out, the money for electric cars in Finland did not come from the stimulus. Rather, it originated with the Energy Department’s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturing program, which predated the Obama administration. The claim about “windmills in China” is also inaccurate.
6) “When they see us putting – when they see us putting daylight between ourselves and our allies in Israel, that gives them encouragement.” The Israeli Deputy Prime Minister and Defense Minister, Ehud Barak, told CNN, “President Obama is doing … more than anything that I can remember in the past [in regard to our security].”
7) “You see, if you reform these programs for my generation, people 54 and below, you can guarantee they don’t change for people in or near retirement.” Here is how the Romney/Ryan Medicare plan will affect current seniors: 1) by repealing Obamacare, the 16 million seniors receiving preventive benefits without deductibles or co-pays and are saving $3.9 billion on prescription drugs will see a cost increase, 2) “premium support” will increase premiums for existing beneficiaries as private insurers lure healthier seniors out of the traditional Medicare program, 3) Romney/Ryan would also lower Medicaid spending significantly beginning next year, shifting federal spending to states and beneficiaries, and increasing costs for the 9 million Medicare recipients who are dependent on Medicaid.
8) “Obamacare takes $716 billion from Medicare to spend on Obamacare.” Ryan is claiming that Obamacare siphons off $716 billion from Medicare, to the detriment of Medicare beneficiaries. In actuality, that money is saved primarily through reducing over-payments to insurance companies under Medicare Advantage, cutting waste fraud and abuse, and eliminatinginefficiencies in the system. Ryan’s budget plan keeps those same cuts, but directs them toward tax cuts for the rich and deficit reduction.
9) “And then they put this new Obamacare board in charge of cutting Medicare each and every year in ways that will lead to denied care for current seniors.” The Board, or IPAB is tasked with making binding recommendations to Congress for lowering health care spending, should Medicare costs exceed a target growth rate. Congress can accept the savings proposal or implement its own ideas through a super majority. The panel’s plan will modify payments to providers but it cannot “include any recommendation to ration health care, raise revenues or Medicare beneficiary premiums…increase Medicare beneficiary cost-sharing (including deductibles, coinsurance, and co- payments), or otherwise restrict benefits or modify eligibility criteria” (Section 3403 of the ACA). Relying on health care experts rather than politicians to control health care costs has previously attracted bipartisan support and even Ryan himselfproposed two IPAB-like structures in a 2009 health plan.
10) “7.4 million seniors are projected to lose their current Medicare Advantage coverage they have. That’s a $3,200 benefit cut.” Enrollment is actually projected to increase by 11 percent in Medicare Advantage (MA) in 2013. Since the Affordable Care Act was enacted in 2010, Medicare Advantage premiums have decreased an average of 10 percent and enrollment in these plans has increased 28 percent.

11) “This [Medicare premium support] plan that’s bipartisan. It’s a plan I put together with a prominent Democrat senator from Oregon.” Wyden not only voted against Ryan’s budget, he also called the idea that he supported it “nonsense.”
12) “Eight out of 10 businesses, they file their taxes as individuals, not as corporations.” Far less than half of the people affected by the expiration of the upper income tax cuts get any of their income at all from a small businesses. And those people could very well be receiving speaking fees or book royalties, which qualify as “small business income” but don’t have a direct impact on job creation. It’s actually hard to find a small business who think that they will be hurt if the marginal tax rate on income earned above $250,000 per year is increased.
13) “[Unemployment is rising] all around America.” In August, the unemployment rate dropped from a year before in 325 of 372 metro areas surveyed by the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics.
14) “The average tax rate on businesses in the industrialized world is 25 percent, and the president wants the top effective tax rate on successful small businesses to go above 40 percent.” The U.S. is raising historically low amounts of revenue from the corporate income tax, and it already has the second lowest effective corporate tax rate in the world. U.S. corporations are taxed less than their foreign rivals, and the U.S. effective corporate tax rate is low compared to other developed economies.
15) “He’ll keep saying this $5 trillion plan, I suppose. It’s been discredited by six other studies.”The studies Ryan cites actually further prove that Romney/Ryan would, in fact, have to raise taxes on the middle class if he were to keep his promise not to lose revenue with his tax rate reduction.
16) “You can – you can cut tax rates by 20 percent and still preserve these important preferences for middle-class taxpayer. It is mathematically possible. It’s been done before. It’s precisely what we’re proposing.” If Romney/Ryan hope to provide tax relief to the middle class, then their $5 trillion tax cut would add to the deficit. There are not enough deductions in the tax code that primarily benefit rich people to make his math work. As the Tax Policy Centerconcluded, Romney’s plan can’t both exempt middle class families from tax cuts and remain revenue neutral. “He’s promised all these things and he can’t do them all. In order for him to cover the cost of his tax cut without adding to the deficit, he’d have to find a way to raise taxes on middle income people or people making less than $200,000 a year,” the Center found.
17) “So they proposed a $478 billion cut to defense to begin with. Now we have another $500 billion cut to defense that’s lurking on the horizon. They insisted upon that cut being involved in the debt negotiations, and so we have a $1 trillion cut.” Ryan has frequently gotten in hot water for criticizing President Obama for the very same defense cuts that he voted for in 2011.
18) “If these cuts go through, our Navy will be the smallest – the smallest it has been since before World War I.” PolitiFact rated this claim as “Pants on Fire,” noting that “a wide range of experts told us it’s wrong to assume that a decline in the number of ships or aircraft automatically means a weaker military.”
19) “Look at what they’re doing through Obamacare with respect to assaulting the religious liberties of this country. They’re infringing upon our first freedom, the freedom of religion, by infringing on Catholic charities, Catholic churches, Catholic hospitals.” Religious institutions haven’t been forced to “violate their conscience” by paying for contraception. Houses of worship and other religious nonprofits that primarily employ and serve people of the same faith will be exempt from offering birth control.
20) “If you like your health care plan, you can keep it. Try telling that to the 20 million people who are projected to lose their health insurance if Obamacare goes through or the 7-point million – 7.4 million seniors who are going to lose it.” The Affordable Care Act would actually expand health care coverage to 30 million Americans and all seniors will keep their guranteed Medicare benefits, despite Ryan’s fear mongering. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that very few people will have to enroll in new coverage.
21) “We should not have called Bashar Assad a reformer when he was turning his Russian-provided guns on his own people.” In March 2011, Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clintonnoted that “many of the members of Congress of both parties who have gone to Syria in recent months have said they believe he’s a reformer.” However, she did not endorse their view.
22) “When Barack Obama was elected, they had enough fissile material — nuclear material to make one bomb. Now they have enough for five.” This is misleading and unproven. Iran now has enough fissile material, but has not yet enriched to the necessary level for a weapon. The Institute for Science and International Security says “it would take Iran more than two months to produce that amount if it started with 20%-grade uranium, and ‘several months’ to make enough for a bomb using low-enriched uranium. That would give the world community enough time to detect the operation and organize a response, ISIS noted in June.”
23) “[Iran is] racing toward a nuclear weapon.” Israeli and American intelligence officials aren’t so sure.
24) “We don’t want to do is give our allies reason to trust us less [by announcing a withdrawal timeline for Afghanistan].” It’s unclear how our allies would trust us less since they too agreed to the timeline. As Biden pointed outed, “That’s a bizarre statement. .. Forty-nine of our allies — hear me — 49 of our allies signed on to this position.”

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Inevitable: Right-Wing Media Freak Out Over Nonexistent "ACORN" Tie To Occupy Wall Street


From Media Matters

Led by Fox News, right-wing media have claimed that ACORN is playing a "behind [the] scenes role" in Occupy Wall Street, alleging that the group New York Communities for Change (NYCC) -- which is led by a former ACORN official -- is paying people to join protests and collecting money to fund OWS activities. But NYCC has flatly denied these claims, and ACORN -- which has been a right-wing media bogeyman for years -- disbanded in November 2010.

Led By Fox, Right-Wing Media Claim Nonexistent ACORN Is Paying Protesters To Join Occupy Wall Street Movement

Fox News: "ACORN Playing Behind Scenes Role in 'Occupy' Movement." An October 26 FoxNews.com article cited unnamed sources who claimed that "[w]hat people don't understand is that ACORN is behind" the Occupy Wall Street movement. The article also claimed:
The former New York office for ACORN, the disbanded community activist group, is playing a key role in the self-proclaimed "leaderless" Occupy Wall Street movement, organizing "guerrilla" protest events and hiring door-to-door canvassers to collect money under the banner of various causes while spending it on protest-related activities, sources tell FoxNews.com.
The former director of New York ACORN, Jon Kest, and his top aides are now busy working at protest events for New York Communities for Change (NYCC). That organization was created in late 2009 when some ACORN offices disbanded and reorganized under new names after undercover video exposes prompted Congress to cut off federal funds. 
[...]
Sources said NYCC has hired about 100 former ACORN-affiliated staff members from other cities -- paying some of them $100 a day -- to attend and support Occupy Wall Street. Dozens of New York homeless people recruited from shelters are also being paid to support the protests, at the rate of $10 an hour, the sources said.
At least some of those hired are being used as door-to-door canvassers to collect money that's used to support the protests.
Sources said cash donations collected by NYCC on behalf of some unions and various causes are being pooled and spent on Occupy Wall Street. The money is used to buy supplies, pay staff and cover travel expenses for the ex-ACORN members brought to New York for the protests.
Fox News claimed that NYCC ignored "repeated email and telephone requests for comment" but posted NYCC's denial of the story. However, the article went on to claim again that "[s]ources said NYCC was a key player behind a series of recent Occupy Wall Street events." [FoxNews.com, 10/26/11]
NY Post: "ACORN'S Back -- And It's Occupying Wall Street." An October 27 New York Post article cited Fox News and claimed:
ACORN'S back -- and it's occupying Wall Street.
[...]
ACORN disbanded in 2010 after the release of embarrassing videos showing the group's workers coaching conservative activists who were posing as clients how to fraudulently obtain benefits and use them to open a brothel.
Fox News reported yesterday that NYCC has been paying "dozens" of homeless people $10 an hour to sit in Zuccotti Park. The report also said NYCC canvassers go door-to-door asking for money for other causes like PCB relief in schools -- with the money funneled back to OWS.
The New York Post article included a statement from "Jonathan Westin, NYCC's organizing director and a former ACORN organizer" who "denied the reports." [New York Post10/27/11]
Carlson: "ACORN Is Now Operating Under A Different Name" And Is "Organizing 'Guerilla Protests.' " On the October 27 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, co-host Gretchen Carlson cited the FoxNews.com article to claim "ACORN is -- is now operating under a different name, New York Communities for Change ... and that they're organizing quote, 'guerilla protests' and hiring door-to-door canvassers to collect money under the banner of various causes... while spending it on the protests." Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson Jr. claimed that "ACORN is in it, according to FoxNews.com ... through its successor organization." Johnson acknowledged that NYCC "den[ies] any paying of the homeless or any other untoward fundraising activities." [Fox News, Fox & Friends10/27/11, via Media Matters]
Hoft: "ACORN Working Behind The Scenes To Prop Up Occupy Movement." In an October 26 post on Gateway Pundit, Jim Hoft wrote:
One of Barack Obama's first big "community organizer" jobs involved ACORN in 1992. He worked along side ACORN before he became an elected official. Obama also trained ACORN employees. He represented ACORN in court. Obama worked with and protested with ACORN. His campaign donated $800,000 to ACORN in 2008 for voter registration efforts.
[...]
In 2009 Congress voted to defund ACORN and its affiliates. But that didn't stop the Obama Administration from giving $560,000 to ACORN affiliates in 2010.
So it really comes as no surprise that ACORN is working behind the scenes in the Obama-endorsed Occupy movement. [Gateway Pundit, 10/26/11]
The Blaze: "ACORN Is Secretly Helping Organize & Fund The 'Occupy' Movement." An October 26 post on Glenn Beck's website The Blaze cited the Fox News report and claimed that "the former New York office for ACORN is heavily involved in the Occupy Wall Street movement." From The Blaze:
Remember ACORN? If not, try and stretch your memory back to the 2008 presidential campaign and the months that followed.
The controversial community organizing group -- which is now defunct -- came under fire for purportedly engaging in voter fraud.
Now, Fox News is reporting that the former New York office for ACORN is heavily involved in the Occupy Wall Street movement -- so much so, that former members are apparently organizing door-to-door canvassing, events, and other related activities. Considering that this is supposedly a "leaderless" movement, these allegations are curious. [The Blaze, 10/26/11]

But NYCC Has Denied The Accusation That It Is Paying Protesters ...

NYCC: "We Don't Pay Protesters ... Period." In a statement released on October 26, NYCC board member Linnette Ebanks responded to the Fox News report, noting that they "don't pay protesters." From the statement:
Fox News is trying to discredit Occupy Wall Street. New York Communities for Change is a new organization that fights for low- and moderate-income families. We don't pay protesters and any monies raised by NYCC's canvass are used in support of our ongoing issue campaigns. Period.
The reality is that Occupy Wall Street is an organic movement of the 99% outraged at the ability of the 1% to corrupt America's political and financial systems for personal gain while middle class families lose their jobs, their homes, and see their economic future devastated. We call on Fox News to stop its unseemly attacks and to respect the views of the overwhelming majority of Americans who believe that our nation needs a more equitable distribution of wealth. [NYCC, 10/26/11, emphasis added]

... And, As Fox News Admits, It's Hardly A Secret That NYCC Supports The Goals Of Occupy Wall Street

NYCC Executive Director On Sept. 30: "I'm Excited To Announce That New York Communities For Change ... Will Be Showing Our Support For #Occupywallstreet." As Fox News noted in its report, NYCC executive director Jon Kest "publicly threw his organization's support behind the movement in a Sept. 30 opinion piece on HuffingtonPost.com." Indeed, in his Huffington Post piece, Kest wrote, "I'm excited to announce that New York Communities for Change ... will be showing our support for #OccupyWallStreet." [FoxNews.com, 10/26/11; The Huffington Post, 9/30/11]

Moreover, Despite Claims That "ACORN" Is "Secretly Helping" Occupy Wall Street, ACORN No Longer Exists

CNN: "Chapter 7 Means Liquidating And Selling Off All Remaining Assets And Closing Up Shop." From a November 2, 2010, post on the CNN blog Political Ticker:
ACORN, the community group from which a mighty oak of political controversy grew, announced it is filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy by the close of business Tuesday. In March, it began bringing its national operations to a close.
"For over 40 years ACORN has fought the good fight," said CEO Bertha Lewis, today, in a statement on the group's website. "The ongoing political onslaught caused irreparable harm."
[...]
Filing for Chapter 7 means liquidating and selling off all remaining assets and closing up shop. [Political Ticker, CNN.com, 11/2/10]

ACORN Has Long Been A Right-Wing Bogeyman

Right-Wing Media Claimed Defunct ACORN Was Funded Through AHCOA. In July, right-wing media claimed that, after filing for bankruptcy, ACORN was being funded through the Affordable Housing Centers of America. [Media Matters7/7/11]
For the truth about AHCOA, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed O'Keefe Undercover Videos Showed "Illegal Activity." Following a series of undercover videos by conservative filmmaker James O'Keefe, the right-wing media repeatedly claimed ACORN and its employees had engaged in "illegal activity." [Media Matters12/18/09]
For the truth about the actions of ACORN and its employees in O'Keefe's videos, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed ACORN Received Federal Funding In Financial Bailout Bill.Following the passage of the financial bailout legislation in 2008, the right-wing media repeatedly claimed the bill gave ACORN a "slush fund." [Media Matters10/10/08]
For the truth about ACORN and the financial bailout legislation, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed ACORN Received Funding From The Economic Recovery Bill. The right-wing media further claimed that provisions of the 2009 stimulus bill meant "there could be money in there for such organizations as ACORN." [Media Matters2/13/09]
For the truth about ACORN and the stimulus bill, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed "ACORN Qualifies For Funding In Senate Health Care Bill." The right-wing media also claimed that the Senate version of the 2010 health care reform bill would provide funding to ACORN. [Media Matters12/22/09]
For the truth about ACORN and the Senate health care bill, SEE HERE.
Fox News Claimed ACORN "May Stand To Benefit" From Obama's 2011 Budget. Fox News claimed ACORN could receive federal funding under President Obama's 2011 budget. [Media Matters,2/3/10]
For the truth about ACORN and Obama's 2011 Budget, SEE HERE.

And This Is Just The Latest Attack In The Right-Wing's Smear Campaign Against Occupy Wall Street

Right-Wing Media Have Waged A Relentless Smear Campaign Against Occupy Wall Street Movement. Right-wing media have engaged in a relentless smear campaign against the Occupy Wall Street movement, including calling the protesters socialists and Marxists, saying they represent the "fringe of the fringe of the fringe," and claiming they "sound like the Unabomber," among other attacks. [Media Matters10/18/11]
For a guide to the right-wing media's smear campaign against OWS, SEE HERE