Friday, October 28, 2011

TEA PARTY GROUP TO BACHMANN: QUIT THE PRESIDENTIAL RACE

By Tanya Somanader/Think Progress




Tea Party group American Majority offered a directive to the movement’s cheerleader-in-chief: Quit the presidential race. Now. “It’s time for Michele Bachmann to go,” said the group’s president, Ned Ryun, noting that she “has ridden her tea party credentials from obscurity to a national platform like no other.” The group has grown incensed with Bachmann because, as Executive Director Matt Robbins said, “I think it’s pretty obvious that Michele Bachmann is about Michele Bachmann.” “Let’s face it: she’s a back-bencher and has been a back bencher congressperson for years,” he added. “This is not a serious presidential campaign.” Team Bachmann responded by saying that “no single leader speaks” for the Tea Party movement and that “Mr. Ryun, who supports Texas Gov. Rick Perry, is entitled to his own opinion.” But Ryun says he has not “endorsed anybody.” Apparently, the group just can’t get behind Bachmann.

Thursday, October 27, 2011

Inevitable: Right-Wing Media Freak Out Over Nonexistent "ACORN" Tie To Occupy Wall Street


From Media Matters

Led by Fox News, right-wing media have claimed that ACORN is playing a "behind [the] scenes role" in Occupy Wall Street, alleging that the group New York Communities for Change (NYCC) -- which is led by a former ACORN official -- is paying people to join protests and collecting money to fund OWS activities. But NYCC has flatly denied these claims, and ACORN -- which has been a right-wing media bogeyman for years -- disbanded in November 2010.

Led By Fox, Right-Wing Media Claim Nonexistent ACORN Is Paying Protesters To Join Occupy Wall Street Movement

Fox News: "ACORN Playing Behind Scenes Role in 'Occupy' Movement." An October 26 FoxNews.com article cited unnamed sources who claimed that "[w]hat people don't understand is that ACORN is behind" the Occupy Wall Street movement. The article also claimed:
The former New York office for ACORN, the disbanded community activist group, is playing a key role in the self-proclaimed "leaderless" Occupy Wall Street movement, organizing "guerrilla" protest events and hiring door-to-door canvassers to collect money under the banner of various causes while spending it on protest-related activities, sources tell FoxNews.com.
The former director of New York ACORN, Jon Kest, and his top aides are now busy working at protest events for New York Communities for Change (NYCC). That organization was created in late 2009 when some ACORN offices disbanded and reorganized under new names after undercover video exposes prompted Congress to cut off federal funds. 
[...]
Sources said NYCC has hired about 100 former ACORN-affiliated staff members from other cities -- paying some of them $100 a day -- to attend and support Occupy Wall Street. Dozens of New York homeless people recruited from shelters are also being paid to support the protests, at the rate of $10 an hour, the sources said.
At least some of those hired are being used as door-to-door canvassers to collect money that's used to support the protests.
Sources said cash donations collected by NYCC on behalf of some unions and various causes are being pooled and spent on Occupy Wall Street. The money is used to buy supplies, pay staff and cover travel expenses for the ex-ACORN members brought to New York for the protests.
Fox News claimed that NYCC ignored "repeated email and telephone requests for comment" but posted NYCC's denial of the story. However, the article went on to claim again that "[s]ources said NYCC was a key player behind a series of recent Occupy Wall Street events." [FoxNews.com, 10/26/11]
NY Post: "ACORN'S Back -- And It's Occupying Wall Street." An October 27 New York Post article cited Fox News and claimed:
ACORN'S back -- and it's occupying Wall Street.
[...]
ACORN disbanded in 2010 after the release of embarrassing videos showing the group's workers coaching conservative activists who were posing as clients how to fraudulently obtain benefits and use them to open a brothel.
Fox News reported yesterday that NYCC has been paying "dozens" of homeless people $10 an hour to sit in Zuccotti Park. The report also said NYCC canvassers go door-to-door asking for money for other causes like PCB relief in schools -- with the money funneled back to OWS.
The New York Post article included a statement from "Jonathan Westin, NYCC's organizing director and a former ACORN organizer" who "denied the reports." [New York Post10/27/11]
Carlson: "ACORN Is Now Operating Under A Different Name" And Is "Organizing 'Guerilla Protests.' " On the October 27 edition of Fox News' Fox & Friends, co-host Gretchen Carlson cited the FoxNews.com article to claim "ACORN is -- is now operating under a different name, New York Communities for Change ... and that they're organizing quote, 'guerilla protests' and hiring door-to-door canvassers to collect money under the banner of various causes... while spending it on the protests." Fox News legal analyst Peter Johnson Jr. claimed that "ACORN is in it, according to FoxNews.com ... through its successor organization." Johnson acknowledged that NYCC "den[ies] any paying of the homeless or any other untoward fundraising activities." [Fox News, Fox & Friends10/27/11, via Media Matters]
Hoft: "ACORN Working Behind The Scenes To Prop Up Occupy Movement." In an October 26 post on Gateway Pundit, Jim Hoft wrote:
One of Barack Obama's first big "community organizer" jobs involved ACORN in 1992. He worked along side ACORN before he became an elected official. Obama also trained ACORN employees. He represented ACORN in court. Obama worked with and protested with ACORN. His campaign donated $800,000 to ACORN in 2008 for voter registration efforts.
[...]
In 2009 Congress voted to defund ACORN and its affiliates. But that didn't stop the Obama Administration from giving $560,000 to ACORN affiliates in 2010.
So it really comes as no surprise that ACORN is working behind the scenes in the Obama-endorsed Occupy movement. [Gateway Pundit, 10/26/11]
The Blaze: "ACORN Is Secretly Helping Organize & Fund The 'Occupy' Movement." An October 26 post on Glenn Beck's website The Blaze cited the Fox News report and claimed that "the former New York office for ACORN is heavily involved in the Occupy Wall Street movement." From The Blaze:
Remember ACORN? If not, try and stretch your memory back to the 2008 presidential campaign and the months that followed.
The controversial community organizing group -- which is now defunct -- came under fire for purportedly engaging in voter fraud.
Now, Fox News is reporting that the former New York office for ACORN is heavily involved in the Occupy Wall Street movement -- so much so, that former members are apparently organizing door-to-door canvassing, events, and other related activities. Considering that this is supposedly a "leaderless" movement, these allegations are curious. [The Blaze, 10/26/11]

But NYCC Has Denied The Accusation That It Is Paying Protesters ...

NYCC: "We Don't Pay Protesters ... Period." In a statement released on October 26, NYCC board member Linnette Ebanks responded to the Fox News report, noting that they "don't pay protesters." From the statement:
Fox News is trying to discredit Occupy Wall Street. New York Communities for Change is a new organization that fights for low- and moderate-income families. We don't pay protesters and any monies raised by NYCC's canvass are used in support of our ongoing issue campaigns. Period.
The reality is that Occupy Wall Street is an organic movement of the 99% outraged at the ability of the 1% to corrupt America's political and financial systems for personal gain while middle class families lose their jobs, their homes, and see their economic future devastated. We call on Fox News to stop its unseemly attacks and to respect the views of the overwhelming majority of Americans who believe that our nation needs a more equitable distribution of wealth. [NYCC, 10/26/11, emphasis added]

... And, As Fox News Admits, It's Hardly A Secret That NYCC Supports The Goals Of Occupy Wall Street

NYCC Executive Director On Sept. 30: "I'm Excited To Announce That New York Communities For Change ... Will Be Showing Our Support For #Occupywallstreet." As Fox News noted in its report, NYCC executive director Jon Kest "publicly threw his organization's support behind the movement in a Sept. 30 opinion piece on HuffingtonPost.com." Indeed, in his Huffington Post piece, Kest wrote, "I'm excited to announce that New York Communities for Change ... will be showing our support for #OccupyWallStreet." [FoxNews.com, 10/26/11; The Huffington Post, 9/30/11]

Moreover, Despite Claims That "ACORN" Is "Secretly Helping" Occupy Wall Street, ACORN No Longer Exists

CNN: "Chapter 7 Means Liquidating And Selling Off All Remaining Assets And Closing Up Shop." From a November 2, 2010, post on the CNN blog Political Ticker:
ACORN, the community group from which a mighty oak of political controversy grew, announced it is filing for Chapter 7 bankruptcy by the close of business Tuesday. In March, it began bringing its national operations to a close.
"For over 40 years ACORN has fought the good fight," said CEO Bertha Lewis, today, in a statement on the group's website. "The ongoing political onslaught caused irreparable harm."
[...]
Filing for Chapter 7 means liquidating and selling off all remaining assets and closing up shop. [Political Ticker, CNN.com, 11/2/10]

ACORN Has Long Been A Right-Wing Bogeyman

Right-Wing Media Claimed Defunct ACORN Was Funded Through AHCOA. In July, right-wing media claimed that, after filing for bankruptcy, ACORN was being funded through the Affordable Housing Centers of America. [Media Matters7/7/11]
For the truth about AHCOA, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed O'Keefe Undercover Videos Showed "Illegal Activity." Following a series of undercover videos by conservative filmmaker James O'Keefe, the right-wing media repeatedly claimed ACORN and its employees had engaged in "illegal activity." [Media Matters12/18/09]
For the truth about the actions of ACORN and its employees in O'Keefe's videos, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed ACORN Received Federal Funding In Financial Bailout Bill.Following the passage of the financial bailout legislation in 2008, the right-wing media repeatedly claimed the bill gave ACORN a "slush fund." [Media Matters10/10/08]
For the truth about ACORN and the financial bailout legislation, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed ACORN Received Funding From The Economic Recovery Bill. The right-wing media further claimed that provisions of the 2009 stimulus bill meant "there could be money in there for such organizations as ACORN." [Media Matters2/13/09]
For the truth about ACORN and the stimulus bill, SEE HERE.
Right-Wing Media Claimed "ACORN Qualifies For Funding In Senate Health Care Bill." The right-wing media also claimed that the Senate version of the 2010 health care reform bill would provide funding to ACORN. [Media Matters12/22/09]
For the truth about ACORN and the Senate health care bill, SEE HERE.
Fox News Claimed ACORN "May Stand To Benefit" From Obama's 2011 Budget. Fox News claimed ACORN could receive federal funding under President Obama's 2011 budget. [Media Matters,2/3/10]
For the truth about ACORN and Obama's 2011 Budget, SEE HERE.

And This Is Just The Latest Attack In The Right-Wing's Smear Campaign Against Occupy Wall Street

Right-Wing Media Have Waged A Relentless Smear Campaign Against Occupy Wall Street Movement. Right-wing media have engaged in a relentless smear campaign against the Occupy Wall Street movement, including calling the protesters socialists and Marxists, saying they represent the "fringe of the fringe of the fringe," and claiming they "sound like the Unabomber," among other attacks. [Media Matters10/18/11]
For a guide to the right-wing media's smear campaign against OWS, SEE HERE

The voter suppression effort


If You Can't Win On The Merits, Cheat

By Mitchell Rivard/Progress Michigan

Republicans’ 2012 election strategy? If you can't win the vote fairly, keep people from voting.
This year, a wave of legislation tightening voting restrictions has suddenly swept across the nation. All but two of the new laws were signed by Republican governors and generated by Republican legislatures. According to a study published by the Brennan Center for Justice, these new state laws could prevent more than five million Americans from casting a ballot and will disproportionately affect younger people, minorities and low-income voters. That’s a number larger than the margin of victory in two of the last three presidential elections. And it’s no coincidence that these groups tend to vote Democratic. 
The GOP strategy is simple: Suppress the vote, win the election. Restrictive laws have already been passed in 13 states. Now Republicans are turning their sights on Michigan. Already this year, Michigan GOP legislators have introduced 10 bills modeled off of other states’ legislation to suppress the vote. 

SB751 and HB5060 - Restricting Absentee Voting
SB751 and HB5060, sponsored by Sen. David Robertson (R-Grand Blanc) and Rep. Cindy Denby (R- Handy Township), are being disguised under the veil of “no-reason absentee voting,” but don’t be fooled. While both bills would allow anyone to request an absentee ballot, they would require voters to pick up their ballot in person at their county clerk’s office. They would also require citizens to show a photo ID to get their ballot. In a recent Michigan Messenger article, Jocelyn Benson, the Democratic candidate for Secretary of State in 2010, summed it up best:
This law sets up a system of preferential treatment for voters who are able to jump through additional hoops to receive their absentee ballot, and may lead to unfounded and unwarranted suspicion of voters who are unable to jump through these hoops.
SB751 would also establish a system within the Michigan Department of State to tag voter files as “active” or “inactive.” The computerized system would tag a file as “inactive” if it detects? that a voter had moved out of the state or not voted in six years. AV ballots received by voters with inactive file tags would automatically be challenged.

SB754 - Making It Harder to Register To Vote
Sponsored by Sen. Mark Jansen (R-Gaines), this legislation is part of a series of bills that will make it harder for people to register to vote. It would make it harder for nonprofit organizations - such as religious and civic groups - to help people register by adding several burdensome, bureaucratic regulations:
  • Groups would have to register with the Michigan Department of State and provide the name and address of every person who is helping register voters in Michigan.
  • Organization leaders would have to attend a training developed by the secretary of state, and those who attend the training would have to provide the same training to the rest of the staff who are registering people to vote.
  • Any voter registration forms collected by nonprofit organizations within seven days of the voter registration deadline would have to be turned into election authorities within one business day, or they would be invalid.
Why is the GOP so fixated on throwing up irrelevant barriers to people exercising their right to vote? Don’t be fooled -- this isn’t a state-by-state issue. Instead, this is a national coordinated campaign by the Koch brothers and their corporate allies at the American Legislative Exchange Commission (ALEC) to manipulate the 2012 elections. 
It’s certainly no accident that these new laws are aimed at disenfranchising Democrats. It’s also not an accident that Republicans are targeting swing states like Michigan - which will certainly be a battleground state for the White House and control of the United States Senate.

View image

Just Three Corporate Front Groups Spent 13 Times As Much As The Entire Labor Movement To Buy Judicial Elections

By Ian Millhiser/Think Progress


After the Supreme Court’s Citizens United decision opened the floodgates to unlimited corporate money in American elections, the decision’s defenders claimed this wasn’t such a big deal because unions could also take advantage of the decision. A new report by three leading voting rights and judicial independence groups gives the lie to this claim. According to the report, just three corporate interest groups — The Ohio Chamber of Commerce, the Business Council of Alabama, and the Illinois Civil Justice League spent more than 13 times as much trying to influence state supreme court elections as the entire labor movement:
The report focuses on the 2009-10 cycle, so it does not include the recent Wisconsin Supreme Court race where incumbent Justice David Prosser narrowly defeated a progressive challenger after corporate front groups rode to his rescue with hundreds of thousands of dollars worth of funds.

ANALYSIS: Warren Buffett Would Pay As Little As 0.2 Percent Tax Rate Under Rick Perry’s Tax Plan

 Seth Hanlon/think progress

Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry released a tax plan this week that he and many media reports called a “20 percent flat tax.” But Perry’s new alternative tax scheme is hardly “flat.”
Leaving aside the fact that it is layered on top of the existing tax code, it establishes not one but two different tax rates: 20 percent for wages, and zero percent for investment income. Because capital gains and dividends would be sheltered from taxes under Perry’s plan, some of the wealthiest Americans would wind up paying nowhere near 20 percent overall.
In fact, billionaire Warren Buffett, who has lamented the fact that he currently pays only 11 percent of his adjusted gross income in federal income taxes, would pay as little as 0.2 percent under Perry’s plan.
Perry’s campaign has helpfully released a sample of the tax form that wealthy people would use under his plan. We’ve taken the liberty of filling out this form for four high-income Americans whose tax information is public: Buffett, Dick Cheney, Barack Obama, and Perry himself. By computing their tax bill using Perry’s sample tax form and the income reported on their most recent actual tax returns, we can calculate just how big a tax cut Perry is proposing to give them.
Here are the results [CLICK ON THE FORMS FOR A LARGER IMAGE]:
BUFFETT: Since the legendary investor receives most of his income from capital gains and dividends, Perry’s plan wipes out most of his already-low tax bill. Buffett reported $62,855,038 in income on last year’s tax return while receiving only $600,000 in compensation from Berkshire Hathaway and the Washington Post Co. (where he is a director). If, aside from that $600,000, all of his other income is from capital gains and dividends, Buffett’s effective federal income tax rate under the Perry plan would be a microscopic 0.2 percent. Buffett’s tax bill would be slashed from the $6.9 million he actually paid in 2010 to $120,000. (Even if Buffett had two-thirds of his income in the form of capital gains and dividends, the average for the richest 400 people in the country, he’d get a $2.7 million tax cut and pay a 6.8 percent effective rate.)
CHENEY: Former Vice President and Halliburton CEO Dick Cheney fares almost as well under Perry’s tax plan. Cheney reported $3.1 million in income on his 2007 tax return (the most recent available), including $2.1 million in dividends and capital gains. Since he’d only pay Perry’s 20 percent tax on his other income, his tax bill would be reduced by about two-thirds — a $387,000 cut. Cheney’s effective rate, which was 19.1 percent in 2007, would be 6.4 percent under Perry’s plan. Of course, this is probably fine with Cheney, since he believes that deficits don’t matter.
OBAMA: Even though President Obama has said that “people like me don’t need another tax cut,” Perry’s plan would give him a big one. The Obamas reported relatively little investment income on their most recent tax return. Still, they would get a $60,000 tax cut from Perry’s plan because they paid more than 20 percent on their other income ($1.8 million from the President’s salary, book sales, and other items). President Obama has proposed the polar opposite of Perry’s plan by suggesting the “Buffett rule,” which would ensure that millionaires can’t pay lower taxes than middle-class families.
PERRY: Perry himself would receive a tax cut of $6,310, based on the income reported on his most recent tax return. That would drop his effective rate from 18.6 percent to 15.8 percent. (If Perry has another large capital gain like he did from selling land in 2007, he’d benefit even more. Had his tax plan been in effect that year, the Perrys would have saved more than $150,000 in taxes on $1.1 million of income and paid a minuscule 3.8 percent effective rate.)
The bottom line: It’s pretty clear from crunching some numbers on his proposed tax form that Perry is not proposing a 20 percent flat tax (nor would a flat tax be a good idea in any event). Far from flat, Perry is proposing an upside-down tax that delivers more tax cuts for the wealthy on top of the ones they’ve already received in recent years — exploding the deficit and shifting a greater share of the tax burden onto the middle class.

REPORT: House GOP’s ‘Job Creating’ Spending Cuts Destroyed 370,000 Jobs

By Travis Waldron/Think Progress

House Republicans took the government to the brink of shutdown last spring by demanding across-the-board budget cuts to many vital programs. Instead of focusing on job creation, as Americans wanted them to, the GOP turned its attention to slashing funds for programs that funded assistance for women and children, local law enforcement, the social safety net, environmental protections, and many other programs they deemed as either too expensive or unnecessary. Worse, when challenged on why they hadn’t made the effort to tackle high unemployment, Republicans insisted that their slash-and-burn budget cuts were meant to create jobs.
Not all of those cuts made it through, but the GOP succeeded in passing massive spending reductions as part of a continuing resolution that kept the government operating. According to a new report from the Center for American Progress’ Scott Lilly, those cuts didn’t result in the job creating boon Republicans insisted would follow. Instead, it has done just the opposite, as those cuts will result in the destruction of roughly 370,000 jobs.
Lilly’s report focuses on three major areas where Republicans insisted on spending cuts: funding for local law enforcement, environmental cleanup of sites where nuclear weapons were disabled and destroyed, and investments into construction, repair, and maintenance of government buildings. Cuts to just those three areas will result in the loss of 90,000 jobs, the report found — 60,000 from direct cuts, and 30,000 additional jobs lost from the secondary impacts of job losses in each community.
And according to Lilly, those three areas weren’t among the worst budget cuts forced through by the Republican House:
Similar stories could be told about many other budget cuts made in this bill—cuts that resulted in further job losses,” said Scott Lilly, author of the report and Senior Fellow at the Center for American Progress. “All of the various 250 program reductions in the fiscal year 2011 Continuing Resolution probably eliminated more than 370,000 American jobs. The three areas selected for discussion in this paper are in my judgment neither the worst cuts made by the committee from a policy standpoint nor the best. But without a doubt they demonstrate the consequences of slashing government spending in a weak economy.”
According to the report, the $2.5 billion cut to local law enforcement funding could have prevented 36,000 police layoffs nationwide, and similar cuts made to grant programs could have prevented the loss of other state and local government jobs. Crunched by the recession and budget cuts, state and local governments shed more than 200,000 jobs in 2010 alone. Republicans not only cut such funding this spring but have now opposed the American Jobs Act — which included grants to state and local governments for the hiring of teachers, police officers, and firefighters.

Wednesday, October 26, 2011

Highlights From Pat Buchanan's Bigotry Tour

by Bradley Herring, Jon Salvia, & Doug Stauffer/Media Matters

While promoting his new book "Suicide of a Superpower," MSNBC contributor Pat Buchanan has made the rounds on talk radio defending his past anti-LGBT bigotry, knowingly appearing on a pro-white radio show, and refusing to disavow genetic theories of racial superiority and inferiority.
Visit http://mediamatters.org/action/buchanan/ to take action.

PoliticsNation:Nice try Rick Scott, we got you.


Matty vs. the 99 percent

By Curt Guyette/Metro Times



For many critics of the Occupy Wall Street movement, the issue is framed as one of resentment. In this narrow characterization of the protests that have sprung up in cities across America in recent weeks, malcontents are angered simply by the continued concentration of wealth at the top of the system. 
The way we see it, the issue isn't so much resentment of the fabulously wealthy, but rather a rising recognition how wealth has corrupted democracy, skewing the playing field in a way that allows powerful corporate interests and the already rich to continue tilting the political system more and more in their favor, to the detriment of the rest of us.
The more money you have, the more power you get. And the more power you get, the more you are able to engineer changes that allow even more money to come your way.
Which brings us to state Rep. Rashida Tlaib (D-Detroit) and the group Bridgewatch Detroit. They are reaching out to the Occupy Detroit protesters, who have set up camp in Grand Circus Park, and their fellow travelers in an attempt to gain allies in the fight against a particularly noteworthy example of the 1 percent problem: billionaireManuel "Matty" Moroun and his Ambassador Bridge Company.
If there is a more telling example of how concentrated wealth can be used to skew public policy, we'd like to see it. Just last week, a Michigan Senate committee effectively blocked a bill that sought construction of a publicly owned span downriver from Matty's Ambassador Bridge. 
(Senate Democratic Floor Leader Tupac A. Hunter of Detroit claimed to have had bipartisan support for a version of the bill that included strong protections for the Delray neighborhood, where the proposed bridge would be located. That support, however, never materialized, so he ended up abstaining. "I was double-crossed in the 11th hour by Senate Republican leadership," he said in a release." Virgil Smith, another Detroit Dem, also abstained, meaning the bill failed to get enough votes to move out of committee.)
"I am disappointed that my legislative colleagues chose to believe a special interest — the Ambassador Bridge owners — over their own Republican-led administration," Tlaib said in a release. "I had hoped that the people's Legislature would not be turned into the Ambassador Bridge Legislature, but that is what happened in the Senate today with the failure to approve legislation that would have created jobs and protected families."
Instead, what got protected was a virtual monopoly and the vast profits it generates for Moroun and crew, who were able to at least stall once again a measure supported by Michigan's Republican governor and the state's Department of Transportation, the government of Canada, the Big Three automakers, the chambers of commerce representing both the metro area and the state, numerous labor unions and more.
It was done by using a multimillion-dollar television campaign that has been roundly — and rightly — criticized for its deceptions and distortions. 
And so, Tlaib and other southwest Detroiters who say they are tired of seeing both the courts and the Legislature fail them, are seeking the help of other 99 percenters in this battle against Moroun.
"The residents in my district are feeling defeated," Tlaib tells News Hits. "They are feeling like money can buy whatever it wants."
The inherent hope in the Occupy movement is that, ultimately, even the richest special interest can be defeated if enough people band together and flex their collective political muscle. It is Tlaib's hope as well.
"We are reaching out," says Tlaib. "We need help with our 1 percent problem."
To that end, a protest is scheduled to begin at 5 p.m. on Thursday, Oct. 27, at the corner of 18th and Lafayette. For more information e-mail DetroitBridgewatch@gmail.com.

Conservative blogger gives out free bongs to embarrass protesters

By David Edwards/Raw Story

James O’Keefe would be proud.
A conservative blogger has been accused of trying to give out marijuana bongs and Che Guevara rolling papers in Zuccotti Park in order to make Occupy Wall Street protesters look criminal.
New York City resident Joey Boots captured video of Evan Coyne Maloney being confronted by protesters after he allegedly tried to pass out the paraphernalia. At one point, Maloney is seen trying to hand a protester a pack of rolling papers with the image of Che Guevara.
One protester who got a peek at Maloney’s prepared questions noted that they were all “anti-liberal.”
“Is Bill Clinton the bad guy?” the protester observed. “Is Barack Obama? Democrats are the bad guy? He’s doing this because he’s going to sell it.”
“I wish I could sell it,” Maloney replied.
“You’re a Fox News guy trying to make us all look bad with your anti-liberal — He just gave out — He’s trying to give people bongs to make us look bad!” the protester shouted. “Over there they gave out bongs. He’s like, ‘You answer, here’s a bong.’ Trying to get that one shot… All [Maloney's assistant] had was bongs, peace signs with marijuana and Che Guevara rolling papers. Three things when Fox News gets it, they’ll just clip that then it’s just like protesters accept it.”
“Do you have bongs and marijuana leaf pictures and stickers and Che Guevara?” Boots asked. “Are you giving it out? Do you have it in that backpack?”
“We got ourselves some Che Guevara rolling papers,” Maloney admitted as he tried to hand a pack to a protester. “We’re giving these away.”
“Are we going to expect to see those pictures on Fox News?” Boots wondered.
“I don’t know if they’ll pick it up,” Maloney replied. “Maybe you’ll see it on CNN.”
“Why don’t you give us some thermals?” the protester demanded. “We’re staying through the winter. Not bongs.”
“How about a blanket?” Boots pressed. “People need blankets. You could give away a blanket. You could give away a sandwich, some free pizza.”
Fox News first noticed Maloney’s work in 2003 when Brit Hume featured clips of his Protesting the Protesters documentary that cast a negative light on anti-war demonstrators.
Since then, Fox News’ Sean Hannity has also interviewed Maloney about Indoctrinate U, a film that tries to expose censorship of conservatives on college campuses.
Watch this video from Joey Boots, uploaded to YouTube Oct. 25, 2011.