Thursday, September 22, 2016

Tulsa police officer who shot Terence Crutcher is indicted for manslaughter

Adam Peck/Think Progress
Earlier this week, the Tulsa police department released dash cam and helicopter footage from the scene of broken down car that turned deadly when officer Betty Shelby shot and killed the 40-year-old Crutcher, who could be seen with his hands in the air.
District Attorney Stephen Kunzweiler announced during a Thursday afternoon press conference that Shelby would be charged with 1st degree manslaughter, and that a warrant has been issued for her arrest.
This is a developing story and will be updated as more information becomes available.

The myth of Gary Johnson

Judd Legum/Think Progress
There are a lot of people planning to vote for Gary Johnson for president.
He doesn’t have quite enough supporters to qualify him for the upcoming presidential debates. But recent polls show Johnson, the Libertarian Party nominee, attracting between 7 and 13 percent of voters.
You might think that Johnson, a former Republican governor of New Mexico who ran for president as a Republican in 2012, would be attracting most of his support from Republicans.
You would be wrong.
A Quinnipiac Poll released earlier this month found Johnson drawing roughly equally from Republicans and Democrats.
Quinnipiac University National Poll, September 8–13
Diving deeper, Johnson’s support comes disproportionately from young Democrats and Independents who supported Bernie Sanders in the primary. He’s running ahead of Trump and about even with Clinton with this group.
Quinnipiac University National Poll, September 8–13
On the surface, this makes a bit of sense. Johnson embraces a few Millennial-friendly positions like marijuana legalization, reproductive rights, and a non-interventionist foreign policy.
But dive just a little deeper and the case for former members of Bernie’s revolution to support Johnson falls apart.

People power versus corporate power

At the core of Sanders’ campaign was the idea that corporate power is completely out of control. His revolution, at its heart, is a quest to take power away from corporations and return it to the people.
Sanders’ motivation was probably best expressed in this rousing speech he delivered at an ABC Democratic primary debate, when he talked about how much corporations would loathe a Sanders presidency.
“The greed of the billionaire class, the greed of Wall Street, is destroying this economy. And it’s destroying the lives of millions of Americans,” he said.
If you went into a lab and created a candidate who has the opposite view of corporate power as Bernie Sanders, he would look a lot like Gary Johnson.
Johnson is a strong supporter of Citizen’s United and believes corporations should be able to spend unlimited funds to influence elections.
Johnson wants to reduce the corporate income tax from 35 percent to 0 percent.
Johnson opposes additional regulation or restrictions on corporations and would take a “hands-off” approach.
Johnson wants to eliminate the income tax and replace it with a national sales tax. This would effectively be a massive tax cut for billionaires and a tax hike for the poor and middle class.

Down with TPP

The gulf between these two candidates extends to other issues that animated the Sanders campaign.
For instance, Sanders vocally opposed the TPP and is credited with helping push Hillary Clinton to clarify her own opposition to the trade pact.
“Behind this legislation is all of corporate America…behind this legislation is Wall Street. Behind this legislation is the pharmaceutical industry,” Sanders said at a campaign event in June.
Sanders said it was imperative to oppose the TPP to “stand with working people and not with the big money interests.”
Johnson, however, supports the TPP, saying the trade deal would “move the ball forward.”

Let it burn

Another core tenet of Sanders’ platform was an extremely aggressive plan to combat climate change that included phasing out of fossil fuels completely, eliminating of oil industry tax breaks, opposing fracking, and supporting a carbon tax.
Gary Johnson does, to his credit, acknowledge climate change is occurring.
But asked this summer if he actually has a plan to do anything about it, Johnson said “no.”
Johnson recently said he was a “skeptic” that any government policy could address climate change.
A couple of years ago, he suggested it was pointless to address climate change because, eventually, the sun will swallow the earth.
The Libertarian Party platform, which Johnson is running on, would eliminate all government regulation of the energy industry.

Tear down the nets

There has been a lot of talk in recent years about cutting Social Security and Medicare to save money.
Bernie Sanders took the opposite approach. He wants to expand Social Security. He even made a whole campaign ad about it.
Bernie’s advocacy achieved a measure of success when the expansion of Social Security became an official part of the Democratic Party platform.
The Libertarian Party platform, however, calls for the abolition of Social Security. It would be replaced with nothing.

The opposite of free

Bernie Sanders attracted scores of young people to his campaign. One of his popular policies among this demographic: Free college tuition.
Hillary Clinton adopted a version of this policy prior to securing Sanders’ endorsement, promising free college tuition for families earning under $125,000 per year.
Gary Johnson, meanwhile, would eliminate the Department of Education — the agency that administers the Pell Grant program, which enables millions of students to attend college each year.
Johnson also appears deeply confused about the student loans but wants toeliminate government support for college students.
The Libertarian Party platform calls for the elimination of public schools.

A $15 difference

Bernie Sanders proudly campaigned on a national $15 minimum wage, which has become a rallying cry among workers around the country seeking a living wage.
This policy was also eventually included in the Democratic Party platform.
Gary Johnson would repeal the current federal minimum wage of $7.25 and let corporations offer even lower wages.

Medicare for none

Bernie Sanders advocates a single-payer health care system that essentially opens up Medicare to all Americans.
Hillary Clinton takes somewhat of a more incremental approach to health care reform. She wants to build on Obamacare and add a public option.
Gary Johnson, on the other hand, would eliminate the federal Medicare program and just provide a block grant to the states.

On a fundamental level, Gary Johnson is proposing the creation of an America that would make Bernie Sanders’ vision impossible.
In 2012, Johnson proposed a 43 percent cut to federal government spending. (This year he says he can balance the budget with a 20 percent cut to federal government spending. It’s unclear why he doesn’t need that other 23 percent anymore, but it’s still a massive reduction that would likely plunge the U.S. economy into a recession.)
This effectively means the government taking a massive step back and letting corporations fill the gap. In Johnson’s America, corporations will be completely in charge of the environment, health care, retirement, trade and wages.
This should not be appealing to former Bernie Sanders supporters. But, up until now, it has been. And whether it remains that way could have a big impact on the outcome of the 2016 election.
Motor City Sidebar: It's clear young white liberals don't know anything about the people they're supporting.

Trump finally asked about his foundation scandal, descends into complete incoherence

By Judd Legum/Think Progress 
The Donald J. Trump foundation is supposed to be a charity.
But reporting by the Washington Post’s David Fahrenthold has revealed that it frequently acted as Trump’s personal piggy bank.
Charities are prohibited from making political contributions or self-dealing. Trump, however, used his foundation’s cash to make an illegal $25,000 donation to Florida Attorney General Pam Bondi. Through his foundation he also purchased two large portraits of himself for $30,000 and a Tim Tebow helmet for for $12,000.
Trump spent another $120,000 from the foundation to purchase a luxury trip to France, including a dinner with actor Salma Hayek. (An aide told BuzzFeed he never went on the trip.)
The lastest report detailed $250,000 in foundation assets Trump used to settle legal disputes involving his for-profit business ventures.
Trump has not held a press conference since July. But he was finally askedabout the misuse of his foundation’s cash by a local reporter in Columbus, Ohio.
It did not go well.
Trump was asked to “explain to people why you may have used some charitable donations for personal uses.”
“The foundation is really rare. It gives money to vets. It’s really been doing a good job,” Trump replied.
He added that “we put that to sleep just by putting out the last report.”
That was his entire response.
It’s unclear what “report” Trump is referencing and how it put the controversy “to sleep.” But Trump has not responded substantively to the controversy, which may have involved multiple violations of tax laws.
His campaign did issue a rambling statement dismissing the reports on the foundation as “peppered with inaccuracies and omissions from a biased reporter.”

Washing your hands off blood 2.0

There's another case of we're going to wash our hands of blood if we enable another American dark age, professional ass clown @HumanistReport wrote a shitty piece entitled "If Trump wins, blame Clinton" the writer claims Clinton is running a campaign that has no vision it's clear Mikey here hasn't ventured outside the Bernie dank memes and other lame ass pro-Bern/emo left blogosphere because Clinton has a detailed plan for every issue that's out there the problem for her is the media rather cover rantings of a mad man with orange hair and talk about debunked Clinton scandals.

Again like the other clown @DanielDenvir Mikey is trying to play don't blame young, dumb entitled white kids card if Donald Trump wins.  My take on this if Trump wins, yes you motherfuckers should get the blame and should take the longest walk of shame ever while people of color throw shit at you.  You're not voting for Gary Johnson or Jill Stein out of principle you're voting for these loons because you didn't have people in your lives that told no so you're going to make the non-believers pay.
The problem for guys like @HumanistReport and @DanielDenvir they're so stuck in Bernie bro butthurt mode they refuse to look at the actual picture Clinton is outperforming the pace President Obama had with voters of color and she's threatening to turn once reliable Republican states into Democratic states.

I have a feeling if the shoe was on the other foot and Clinton supporters were talking about sitting out the election or voting 3rd party I think @HuamnistReport headline would be if "Trump wins, blame big baby Clinton supporters" like I stated before I thought Bernie was lame, one issue pony and he refused to talk to people of color about our issues. But if he was the nominee I would hold my nose and vote for him because the fate of the country is way bigger than my feelings. But entitled white liberals don't feel that way because the only circles they travel in are with other well-off to do white liberals. And the few people of color they interact with think like them.

One last thing the Bernie would be winning myth: By judging the media treatment of the two camps, no Bernie wouldn't be winning if he was the Democratic nominee. And B. Bernie been running for a president for a year and he didn't experience any prolong negative campaign. Clinton didn't attack him because she didn't want to come off as a bully and she would be wasting money on attacking another candidate that only has one core group of supporters. Republicans didn't go after him because they were hoping Democrats were dumb enough to nominate him. And crush with ads saying he's going to raise taxes to pay for his "far left" agenda plans and his honeymoon in the USSR.

I got to admit I do enjoy watching entitled white people proclaim they're going to support Gary Johnson because they claim Clinton supports TPP and fracking while voting for a guy who supports both of those things.

Yes Donald Trump supporters should be shamed

For people who lives outside of the state of Michigan, the Detroit News is probably known for two things 1. carrying the water for the state and national Republican party. and  2. their editorial board goes out its way to  justify or defend racism.

For their ironically titled section "Think" the second moron in charge behind resident grand wizard Nolan Finley Ingrid Jacques writes a piece about how hard it is for Donald Trump supporters and mean people are going to shame them. A couple of things the  people who are supporting Donald Trump were the same people eight years ago mocking then Senator Obama as only being a community organizer and citing he has no experience to become president. Yet Donald Trump has no history of being elected to anything and if you cite his business record as a reason then let's look at that record 1. his business owes millions of dollars in debt  and 2. the man lost money in the casino business.

She whines about Clinton's basket of deplorable, which is an incorrect statement it's not half most if not all of Donald Trump supporters are racist. Trump kicked off his campaign claiming Mexican immigrants were criminals and rapist, on social media Donald Trump and his sons have retweeted white nationalists and other white pride accounts. And he recycles myths about the black community in front of mostly white audiences. And just yesterday he wants to make stop and frisk a national thing and the only people that get stop by this program are black and latino men.  Before that Donnie jr decided to tweet an offensive meme comparing Syrian refugees as Skittles.

Let me go back further one of Trump's top campaign managers worked for the biggest right-wing website on the web today "Breitbart" and that site is home to people who don't care for people of color, women, people in the LGBT community and non-Christians.  And Jewish journalists are coming out and telling their stories of Trump supporters posting anti-semantic bullshit in their Twitter timelines and emails. All Ingrid has to do is go to Google and type Trump rallies and racism she'll see the New York Times video entitled "Voices from Donald Trump's rallies" where you hear Trump supporters scream dirty beaners, you see a guy wearing a shirt saying "Fuck Islam" and during a portion of Donald Trump's speech to the crowd he mentions President Obama and you could hear a person scream "Fuck that nigger". Even the Daily show ripped the white hood of Trump supporters by asking them simple questions and these morons fucking it up.

So in closing yes Donald Trump supporters should be ashamed because there is no logical reason case can be made for why Donald Trump should be president.

Friday, September 16, 2016

Let it Derp

Michigan Republicans are dumb but these clowns take the cake:








Wash. Post's Dave Weigel Explains How Trump's Extraordinarily Brief Policy Statements Exploit A Media Vulnerability

MEDIA MATTERS STAFF
The Washington Post’s Dave Weigel pointed to a massive media vulnerability that Donald Trump regularly exploits, writing that even though the Republican nominee for president “has offered less policy detail than any candidate for president in my lifetime,” Trump is able to game the media because he “has never failed to offer enough detail to fit in a headline or cable news chyron.”
Weigel’s article comes as both Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump released personal health information indrastically different ways, with Clinton releasing detailed letters from her doctor to the public, and Trump choosing to release significantly less information. As Weigel noted, while “The asymmetry between what Clinton released and Trump released was notable … A reader scanning headlines would think that both candidates released full sets of information.”  
Weigel explains that this has been a general trend, in which “coverage of campaigns needs to be shrunk to fit a chyron, anyway” and that “Trump's innovation has been to preshrink the news.” The result is that it appears as if “Trump is trading Clinton blow for blow and white paper for white paper” if voters “only glance at the news.” Weigel added that Trump’s method gives him the “ability to get credit — and the headline, and the chyron — for what other candidates would consider less than a bare minimum.” From the September 15 article:
CBS News reporter Mark Knoller is a Boswellian chronicler of the White House. How many foreign trips has the president taken? How many times has he spoken to the press from the Brady press briefing room? Do not waste precious time: Knoller knows.
This is why it was striking when Knoller tweeted that on Wednesday night's news broadcasts, "newly released medical reports from @HillaryClinton and @realDonaldTrump" were the lead stories. Jamelle Bouie, a CBS News commentator (and former colleague of mine at Slate) was among the people reminding Knoller that Trump had not actually released anything. He had taped an episode of "The Dr. Oz Show"; reporters who talked to audience remembers discovered that he released some details, but not the report.
The asymmetry between what Clinton released and Trump released was notable, though pretty typical of the campaign. Clinton released an updated letter from her physician, which revealed details like her medication regimen and cholesterol level. (It once again debunked the idea that she is staggering from neurological damage, a conspiracy theory furthered on Fox News.) In the body of their stories, most reporters noted the difference between what was revealed; in summing it up for headlines or tweets, the distinction was elided. A reader scanning headlines would think that both candidates released full sets of information.
[...]
What's the upshot of this? I'm going to draw a lesson from a deeply unrelated aspect of my job — I frequently travel through airports or park in newsrooms that are blaring cable TV. Trump has offered less policy detail than any candidate for president in my lifetime. But he has never failed to offer enough detail to fit in a headline or cable news chyron.
That matters. If, like many people, you only glance at the news (yes, we know how long readers spend finishing articles), you come away with the impression that Trump is trading Clinton blow for blow and white paper for white paper. If either candidate released their entire medical history, or Trump revealed his entire tax returns, only a handful of voters might even read them. They'd depend on the press to find the story and the lede. Most coverage of campaigns needs to be shrunk to fit a chyron, anyway; Trump's innovation has been to preshrink the news.
[...]
It's rote for conservatives to see a bias in how their candidate is being covered. On a lot of metrics, like coverage of social issues and immigration, the media's norms are to the left of conservative voters. But there's growing liberal anger about Trump's "hacking" of the media, and his ability to get credit — and the headline, and the chyron — for what other candidates would consider less than a bare minimum.

Media Host Trump Adviser Boris Epshteyn On Russia Without Disclosing His Business Ties

 ERIC HANANOKI/Media Matters


Media outlets have been hosting Donald Trump senior adviser Boris Epshteyn, who has used the platform to defend Russian President Vladimir Putin from criticism and to claim that the Clintons, not Trump, have “been way too cozy with the Russians.” Outlets have failed to disclose during discussions about Russia that Epshteyn has financial ties to the former Soviet Union, which include consulting for “entities doing business in Eastern Europe” and moderating a Russian-sponsored conference on "investment opportunities in Moscow.” 

Epshteyn States He Provides Services For “Entities Doing Business In Eastern Europe”

Boris Epshteyn Is A Senior Adviser To The Trump Campaign. Epshteyn is an investment banker who serves as a senior adviser to Republican nominee Donald Trump’s campaign. He has also regularly appeared in the media as a Republican pundit. [Twitter.com, accessed 9/15/16]
Epshteyn’s Business Activities: “Relationship Management And/Or Consulting Services For Entities Doing Business In Eastern Europe.” According to his Financial Industry Regulatory Authority’s BrokerCheck file, Epshteyn helps entities conduct business in Eastern Europe through Strategy International, LLC. From the file:
Other Business Activities
This section includes information, if any, as provided by the broker regarding other business activities the broker is currently engaged in either as a proprietor, partner, officer, director, employee, trustee, agent or otherwise. This section does not include non-investment related activity that is exclusively charitable, civic, religious or fraternal and is recognized as tax exempt.
1)SINCE MAY 2009, STRATEGY INTERNATIONAL, LLC AND AFFILIATED ENTITY SMETANKA LLC […] (A)PROVIDE RELATIONSHIP MANAGEMENT AND/OR CONSULTING SERVICES FOR ENTITIES DOING BUSINESS IN EASTERN EUROPE. THE BUSINESS CONDUCTED BY THOSE ENTITIES MAY HAVE AN INVESTMENT-RELATED COMPONENT, ALTHOUGH STRATEGY ITSELF DOES NOT PROVIDE INVESTMENT-RELATED SERVICES - 10 HOURS PER WEEK - MAY BE DURING TRADING HOURS; [Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, accessed 9/15/16
Epshteyn’s LinkedIn Says He Provides “Consulting And Liaising Services For For [sic] Domestic And International Transactions With A Focus On Eastern Europe An [sic] Former Soviet Union.” [LinkedIn, accessed 9/15/16]

Epshteyn Moderated 2013 Panel At Russian-Sponsored Conference With Russian Officials

Epshteyn Moderated “Invest In Moscow!” Panel With Russian Officials. Epshteyn moderated an October 28, 2013, panel at the “Invest In Moscow!” conference, during which Russian government officials provided “an overview of the principal investment opportunities in Moscow.” Panelists included several Russian officials including Sergey Cheremin, minister of the Moscow city government and Head of Moscow's Department for Foreign Economic and International Relations. From the event’s program (emphasis in original):
Moderator
Boris Epshteyn, Managing Director of Business and Legal Affairs at TGP Securities Inc.
Panelists:
1. Sergey Cheremin, Minister of the Moscow city government and Head of Moscow's Department for Foreign Economic and International Relations.
2. Andrew Somers, American Chamber of Commerce in Russia President and CEO.
3. Anatoly Valetov, Deputy Head of the Moscow City Department for External Economic and International Relations.
4. Evgeny Dridze, Deputy Head of the Moscow City Department for External Economic and International Relations.
5. Leonid Kostroma, Deputy Director of Moscow City Investment Agency.
Express Panel Topics:
− Moscow: The window to investing in Russia.
− The property complex owned by Moscow as a potential venue for various  investment projects.
− Industry in Moscow: where to set up manufacturing and where to find employees.
− Investments in social infrastructure, energy, and housing and public  utilities – a new trend in Moscow’s investment policy.
− Foreign business experience in Moscow. [The Huffington Post, 8/12/16; Moscowrfny.org, accessed 9/15/16]
Huffington Post: Trump “Keeps A Lot Of People With Financial And Political Ties To The Country Close At Hand,” Including Epshteyn. [The Huffington Post, 8/12/16
Moscow City Government Sponsored “Invest In Moscow!” EventThe event’s page listed the Moscow city government’s Department for Foreign Economic and International Relations as a sponsor for the event. The event’s Facebook page also said that the event received a  “generous sponsorship” from the Moscow city government and featured presentations by a high-level Moscow city government delegation on investment opportunities in Russia's capital to an audience of American business and financial leaders.”
[Moscowrfny.org, accessed 9/15/16, Facebook, 10/31/13]

Media Regularly Fail To Disclose Epshteyn’s Business Ties While Hosting Him To Discuss Russia

CNN’s New Day Saturday Hosted Epshteyn To Talk About U.S. And Russia Without Business Ties Disclosure. Epshteyn appeared on New Day Saturday, where he was identified as a “senior adviser to the Trump campaign.” During the segment, Epshteyn criticized Clinton’s policy toward Russia and claimed she is “a complete unhinged warmonger” and is trying to “start a war” with Russia. He later criticized Clinton for her rhetoric about Putin, which he characterized as “negative, negative, negative” and “absolutely not productive.” [CNN, New Day Saturday, 9/10/16, via CNN.com]
PBS Newshour Hosted Epshteyn To Talk About “How The Candidates View U.S.-Russia Relations” Without Disclosing Business Ties. During its September 8 program, PBS Newshour hosted Epshteyn but did not note his business ties. Host Judy Woodruff stated: “Boris Epshteyn, he advises the Trump campaign. He emigrated to the United States from Russia in the early 1990s. He’s a lawyer specializing in investment banking and finance and he worked for John McCain’s campaign for president.” During the segment, he claimed that “it’s actually the Clintons who have been way too cozy with the Russians.” [PBS, PBS Newshour, 9/8/16, viaPBS.org]
Epshteyn Appeared On CNN Newsroom Without Business Ties Disclosure, Claimed “Russia Did Not Seize Crimea.” Epshteyn appeared on the July 31 edition of CNN Newsroom, where he was identified as a Trump surrogate. CNN did not note his business ties to Russia. During the appearance, Epshteyn stated: “First of all, Russia did not seize Crimea. We could talk about the conflict that happened between the Ukraine and Crimea, it’s an ongoing conflict, but there was no seizure by Russia. That is an incorrect statement, characterization of what happened.” [CNN, CNN Newsroom8/31/16; Talking Points Memo, 9/1/16]
Epshteyn Appeared On Fox News To Talk Russia Without Disclosure About His Russian Business Ties.Epshteyn appeared on Fox News’ Sunday Morning Futures and claimed liberals linking Trump to Russia is a "ridiculous narrative by the left."  He added that the "Clintons are the ones that have real connections to Russia." Fox News did not disclose Epshteyn’s business ties to Russia. [Fox News, Sunday Morning Futures,8/14/16The Hill8/14/16

Millennials are starting to realize that Clinton is not the same as Trump

GRIST/Raw Story
Hillary Clinton got one piece of good news this week: An increasing number of young voters can tell her policies apart from Donald Trump’s.
For Clinton, that’s no small feat.
In July, Tom Steyer’s group NextGen Climate released the first battleground poll of millennial voters this election cycle. The takeaway was a startling number: roughly four out of 10 voters age 34 and younger saw no difference between the two candidates on the issues most important to them.
Now a new follow-up poll by NextGen Climate/Project New America in 11 swing states has found some improvement in Clinton’s numbers in just the month since the last poll was done. More see a difference between the two candidates:
Grist2
Clinton also gained five points since July among likely millennial voters who say they intend to vote for her: 48 percent now back Clinton compared to 23 percent for Trump in a four-way race.
Her gains among Sanders’ most die-hard voters are worth looking at. Around the time of the Democratic National Convention in July, one in five millennials were still devoted Sanders supporters, and most of them didn’t see a difference between Clinton and Trump. Now, the Sanders holdouts have shrunk from 21 to 16 percent, and slightly fewer Sanders supporters still claim there’s no difference between the two major-party candidates.
While Clinton’s numbers have improved, Trump’s have stayed about the same, despite his repeated attempts to reboot his campaign.
“Millennials’ views of Donald Trump haven’t changed — but their awareness of the differences between Trump and Hillary Clinton on the issues has,” Jamison Foser, a strategic advisor to NextGen Climate, said in a statement. “Clinton’s lead has grown and favorability has increased as young voters learn more about the candidates’ policy positions, suggesting that as bad as things are for Trump, they can still get worse.”
The polling firm Global Strategy Group asked voters which candidate represents their views on issues like equal pay and debt-free college. Clinton pulls ahead on these issues and also has stronger favorability on climate-related questions — like moving away from fossil fuels to clean energy and protecting families’ health with clean air and water.
Grist3
Still, 28 percent of likely voters see no difference between Clinton and Trump on protecting air and water and 30 percent don’t think there’s a difference on moving away from fossil fuels. That’s still a lot of voters who don’t see the point in choosing between the two.
Clinton at least has a few more millennial-whisperers working in her corner from now until Election Day. This weekend, Bernie Sanders and Elizabeth Warren will campaign in Ohio to convince this historically unreliable voter demographic that she’s their best bet.

Joy Reid smashes ‘bully’ Trump: He’s ’only aggressive’ when he’s not around the victim he’s bullying

SARAH K. BURRIS/Raw Story
Joy Reid nailed Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump on MSNBC’s “Rachel Maddow Show” Thursday night, when she remarked that he seems unable to bully people to their face.
Today, the Washington Post reported that despite Trump’s efforts to court African-American voters, he refuses to acknowledge that President Barack Obama was born in the United States, much less apologize for the years of birtherism.
“I’ll answer that question at the right time,” Trump told The Post. “I just don’t want to answer it yet.”
Trump has since released a statement blaming Clinton for his birtherism.
Maddow wondered what was “so politically salient” about that old campaign against Obama and his birth certificate.
Reid cited poll numbers from the Republican primaries that showed half of the GOP voters believed Obama’s birthplace was suspect. In fact, more were suspicious of Obama’s birthplace not being in the U.S. than Ted Cruz, who was actually born in Canada.
“You are seeing Donald Trump at his peak self-confidence,” Reid said. “When he gets into the mode of saying he doesn’t have to change fundamental things because he feels right now that he is winning. So, he is going back to the well, going back to things he thinks make him popular.”
For Trump, that means things like the birther campaign, which he must fix. Reid said that he is making an effort to insert himself into African-American communities. Flint for example, where Trump visited a black church Wednesday.
“Good for him,” Reid said. “He is getting involved in a way that the mayor and local officials are like, ‘You are not helping.’ He had this incident at the church. He is speaking before a stone-faced, not interested, sparse group of mostly African-Americans, sort of a youngish — mostly African-American crowd. The headline moment was when the pastor said, ‘This is not what we asked you to come here for. You are not supposed to make a political speech.'”
Reid remarked that on Fox News Thursday morning, Trump said that the room loved him. The pastor might have been terrible but the audience was with him.
“From the perspective of people in the audience, they were yelling at him the whole time,” Reid said, mentioning some of the first-person videos from audience members posted on Twitter. “The pastor saved him. The last thing that was really literally screamed at Donald Trump as he was run out of that room, uncomfortably, was, do you admit that president Obama was born in the United States.”
She explained that the issue is important to African Americans because it was an attempt by Trump to “humiliate the first black president of the United States. To make him show his papers as if we were in Apartheid South Africa. It’s one of the reasons African-Americans are opposed to Donald Trump even though he is doing this pinball thing where he is trying to pull in African-Americans by turning them against migrants of Hispanic origins.”
Reid noted that when Trump actually makes it in front of black audiences he gets negative reactions or no reaction, which is not what he’s accustomed to dealing with.
“I think what you are going to start to see is let’s attempts to listen to those advisers and put himself in those rooms,” Reid said. “Donald Trump turns around and makes a completely different story about what happened for a white audience when he goes to Fox News, which has a tiny African-American audience. He can confidently boast that the room loved me and that pastor was horrible.”
Reid remarked that Trump actually backed down in the presence of the pastor in Flint. He didn’t talk a big game or assert himself, he backed down.
“Donald Trump the blusterer is not the same guy when he is in front of the audience he is insulting when he is in front of the Mexican president. When he is confronted by anyone,” Reid explained. “When he is confronted, he backs down and then turns around and tells a story about how tough he was. The more he puts himself in front of audiences of color, the more he shows off he is passive and aggressive. He is only aggressive when he is not in the presence of the person he is bullying. When he gets in front of the person that he previously insulted, he becomes incredibly passive.”
Check out the full and fascinating video below: